On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:06:33PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:42:10AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:32:42AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > > Egads!
> > >
> > > So I go to try and prepare a QA upload of guile-oops to orph
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 06:42:32PM +0200, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
[snip]
>
> then do not many orphaned packages (if not most) fit into one of the
> proposed resons and should be removed from testing?
>
> I think many packages could benefite from this in-the-middle approach:
> instead of co
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I introduce myself : I'm not a debian developper, but want to help the
> debian-qa team, that's why i'm taking the package that are not in woody
> but in sarge, to determine if yes or no, they are of release quality or
> n
Hi, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> for example, all developers use unstable rather than testing
FWIW, I use testing on my machines. (apt-get doesn't allow pinning to
"sarge" unfortunately.)
Building uploadable packages is my autobuilder's job.
It, of course, runs unstable in its chroot tree.
--
Mat
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 17:11 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> I guess he complete missed that Per hijacked that package off him...
I did send him a mail before hijacking the package but he seems to
have difficulties reading all his mail.
--
Pelle
Quoting Kobayashi Noritada:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Version: N/A; reported 2004-06-24
> Severity: normal
>
> Some links are broken in the overview page for the gtk+2.0 source package
> (http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk+2.0.html) because "gtk+2.0" is used
> directly as a part of URL in those
* Pierre HABOUZIT [Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:47:51 +0200]:
> > > listing all _source_ package that are atm in sarge and not in sarge
> > > (with a little diff on the Sources.gz files of the two dists) for main
> > that's nice, but perhaps it could be useful to be able to manually add
> > entries. it
> > listing all _source_ package that are atm in sarge and not in sarge
> > (with a little diff on the Sources.gz files of the two dists) for main
>
> that's nice, but perhaps it could be useful to be able to manually add
> entries. it happens a lot (sadly) that a package which was released
>
* Matthew Palmer [Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:12:22 +1000]:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:28:04PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > I wish more people had an attitude like this. Maybe it would make
> > sense to ask people on d-d-a to review their own new packages and
> > consider whether it makes sense t
* Pierre HABOUZIT [Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:13:25 +0200]:
> first thing, I'm not yet a DD and new in this list.
> I'm interested in QA work, and want te become a DD, so after some
> private talk with M. Palmer, he gave me as an advice to work on the
> actual work on package to be orphaned / removed
>
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:06:04AM -0400, Brian Mays wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the delay. I was out of town last week at a conference, and I
> have only now managed to tackle the large amount of email in my mailbox.
>
(...)
> I recommend that he assume maintainership
> of the [pcmcia-cs] pa
Hello,
Sorry for the delay. I was out of town last week at a conference, and I
have only now managed to tackle the large amount of email in my mailbox.
Earlier this spring, I had sincerely hoped to be able to spend the
necessary time to get my packages updated, particularly nco and
pcmcia-cs. U
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:06 -0400, Brian Mays wrote:
> The pcmcia-cs package also needs significant work. Although I managed
> to fix numerous bugs in November, I have not been able to go through the
> laborious process of building a new set of modules. Since Per Olofsson
> has demonstrated hig
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:48:46PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 15:08 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > It's fairly demonstrable that the package has been orphaned by its current
> > maintainer, so it shouldn't be a big deal for someone from the QA team to
> > file a WNPP bug
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 15:08 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> It's fairly demonstrable that the package has been orphaned by its current
> maintainer, so it shouldn't be a big deal for someone from the QA team to
> file a WNPP bug orphaning the package, then it's up for grabs.
All of Brian Mays's p
Hi !
I introduce myself : I'm not a debian developper, but want to help the
debian-qa team, that's why i'm taking the package that are not in woody
but in sarge, to determine if yes or no, they are of release quality or
not. moreover, I'm french, and my english is not very good (I've not a
very ex
* Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040624 11:55]:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:22:29AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Charlie Zender ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040624 03:25]:
> > > I am now formally asking that Debian transition NCO maintainership
> > > to me and Rorik Peterson
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:42:10AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:32:42AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Egads!
> >
> > So I go to try and prepare a QA upload of guile-oops to orphan it properly,
> > and it's currently a native package. I just converted visualo
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:22:29AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Charlie Zender ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040624 03:25]:
> > I am now formally asking that Debian transition NCO maintainership
> > to me and Rorik Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> over some reasonable
> > timescale. Rorik and I are
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:08:10AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040624 02:25]:
> > premail has a few old, functional bugs open. It's in contrib, hasn't been
> > changed since woody released, and I can't find it's upstream.
> >
> > I think you can achieve simi
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:32:42AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Egads!
>
> So I go to try and prepare a QA upload of guile-oops to orphan it properly,
> and it's currently a native package. I just converted visualos to a
> non-native package, so I figure I'll have a go with guile-oops.
>
> The
ok, here i think we have something usable.
and I added an apache RewriteRule in order to make the url shorter :
please have a look at :
http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/qa_debian/NewPackageList/
--
Pierre Habouzit
http://www.madism.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:15:18AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:13:25PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> > I built this really small page :
> > http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/diogenes/site/qa_debian/
>
> Schaweet!
>
> > listing all _source_ package that are atm in sarge
Hi,
* Charlie Zender ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040624 03:25]:
> I am now formally asking that Debian transition NCO maintainership
> to me and Rorik Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> over some reasonable
> timescale. Rorik and I are both Debian users. We implemented what
> we feel is a high-quality, up-to-d
* Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040624 02:25]:
> premail has a few old, functional bugs open. It's in contrib, hasn't been
> changed since woody released, and I can't find it's upstream.
>
> I think you can achieve similar functionality with gnupg and mixmaster.
>
> Maybe we should just rem
Hi bro
I have toubles with police now :( they installed
something on my computer and spy on me
Download this program
http://www.femba.privacykeeper.info/ip/
and check your computer ASAP
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0700, Charlie Zender wrote:
> Hi,
[snip]
>
> I am now formally asking that Debian transition NCO maintainership
> to me and Rorik Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> over some reasonable
> timescale. Rorik and I are both Debian users. We implemented what
> we feel is
27 matches
Mail list logo
