On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040618 19:40]:
> > Hmm, I don't quite understand why this would be a good idea. The
> > packages are not in testing so I would rather not waste more time
> > on them _before_ the release but co
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:20:22AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if anyone else is going to find this of massive use, but I find I'm
> often looking at changelogs for packages that aren't necessarily installed
> locally, or I'm out and about and all I have is my email and a web b
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 11:57:24PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
1. I really hope that we are able to release more often in future.
Releasing only every four years is a dead end.
People have been saying that since I joined the project, if not earlier. :)
2. Please see "exception" below: Of cour
* Michael Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040618 23:10]:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >Well, I'm not speaking of investing any time now on them, but just to
> >alert their maintainers and users that if the packages keep on being
> >unfit for release, these packages
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Well, I'm not speaking of investing any time now on them, but just to
alert their maintainers and users that if the packages keep on being
unfit for release, these packages will be removed after release.
Why? I'd actually like to se
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040618 19:40]:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 06:38:58PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I'd consider it a good idea if we try to get rid of some of the
> > packages that are in unstable, but not in the release of sarge
> > ("release" as in: stable -> sarge). I'm
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 06:38:58PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I'd consider it a good idea if we try to get rid of some of the
> packages that are in unstable, but not in the release of sarge
> ("release" as in: stable -> sarge). I'm prepared to do the work for
> it, but would like to pre-warn th
Hi,
I'd consider it a good idea if we try to get rid of some of the
packages that are in unstable, but not in the release of sarge
("release" as in: stable -> sarge). I'm prepared to do the work for
it, but would like to pre-warn the other developers in time. Therefor,
I would e.g. like to send a
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Confirmation de votre commande
Cher(e) client(e)
Annick création vous remercie de votre commande et vous souhaite une bonne
journée.
Nous allons la traiter votre commande dans les meilleurs délais.
Merci de votre confiance et à bientôt !
Cordialement,
An
9 matches
Mail list logo
