Re: Should we remove raidtools?

2004-06-10 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 06:38:46PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 05:29:00PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > It's got RC bugs. I know someone was trying to get a sponsor for an upload > > recently on -devel. > > I thought that was raidtools2. Or did I miss a message somew

Re: Should we remove raidtools?

2004-06-10 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040610 09:40]: > > Do we need to have three different RAID packages in sarge? > > > > >From the package description, it's only necessary for unpatched 2.2 > > >kernels. > > > > Given that we're

Re: Gopal: Maybe you should let go some packages?

2004-06-10 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Gopal, you did not yet reply to this mail I sent a month ago. How are you doing? Could you please reply to this mail? --Jeroen On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:18:05AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Hi Gopal, > > I just took a look at your package list[1], and I believe you maybe > should let

Re: Should we remove raidtools?

2004-06-10 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040610 09:40]: > > Do we need to have three different RAID packages in sarge? > > > > >From the package description, it's only necessary for unpatched 2.2 > > >kernels. > > > > Given that we're

Re: Should we remove raidtools?

2004-06-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:24:41PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > AFAIK we won't be able to kick off 2.2 for sarge. IIRC 2.2 will > > probably be necessary for some m68k- and sparc-variants. I added > > debian-kernel, perhaps

Re: Should we remove raidtools?

2004-06-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-10 17:29]: > Do we need to have three different RAID packages in sarge? > > From the package description, it's only necessary for unpatched 2.2 kernels. I agree that raidtools (v1) can probably go, but let's CC the old maintainer to ask for comments.

Re: Should we remove raidtools?

2004-06-10 Thread Andreas Barth
* Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040610 09:40]: > Do we need to have three different RAID packages in sarge? > > >From the package description, it's only necessary for unpatched 2.2 kernels. > > Given that we're trying to get rid of all 2.2 kernels, can we get rid of > raidtools? AFAIK we w

Re: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])

2004-06-10 Thread support
Response --- Dear Customer, Your question has NOT been submitted. To submit a question to Lantronix Support, please click one of the links below: Post-Sales: http://ltxfaq.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/ltxfaq.cfg/php/enduser/ask.php Pre-Sales:

Re: Should we remove raidtools?

2004-06-10 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 05:29:00PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > It's got RC bugs. I know someone was trying to get a sponsor for an upload > recently on -devel. I thought that was raidtools2. Or did I miss a message somewhere? Either way, I vote 'yes' on getting rid of the raidtools package.

あのとき5千万円■イマ1千万 円■北京オリンピック特需■楽 々して大金■苦労して損金■1 00万円証券6券600万円賞金

2004-06-10 Thread KKB通信      
[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B!!(B $B(B $B$3$l$+$i$N!"[EMAIL PROTECTED]|1_0J>eCy6b!!![$O!"[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B(,(,(B[$B<}F~3HBg$KI,FI!X2?8N9b3[<}F~$K$J$k!*(B $B!Y(B]$B(,(,(B[$B>epJs$H(BPR$B$N3hMQ$GL\E*$N$?$a$N<}F~3HBg!*(,(B

Should we remove raidtools?

2004-06-10 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi, Do we need to have three different RAID packages in sarge? >From the package description, it's only necessary for unpatched 2.2 kernels. Given that we're trying to get rid of all 2.2 kernels, can we get rid of raidtools? It's got RC bugs. I know someone was trying to get a sponsor for an up