On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 06:38:46PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 05:29:00PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > It's got RC bugs. I know someone was trying to get a sponsor for an upload
> > recently on -devel.
>
> I thought that was raidtools2. Or did I miss a message somew
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040610 09:40]:
> > Do we need to have three different RAID packages in sarge?
> >
> > >From the package description, it's only necessary for unpatched 2.2
> > >kernels.
> >
> > Given that we're
Gopal, you did not yet reply to this mail I sent a month ago. How are
you doing?
Could you please reply to this mail?
--Jeroen
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:18:05AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Hi Gopal,
>
> I just took a look at your package list[1], and I believe you maybe
> should let
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040610 09:40]:
> > Do we need to have three different RAID packages in sarge?
> >
> > >From the package description, it's only necessary for unpatched 2.2
> > >kernels.
> >
> > Given that we're
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:24:41PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > AFAIK we won't be able to kick off 2.2 for sarge. IIRC 2.2 will
> > probably be necessary for some m68k- and sparc-variants. I added
> > debian-kernel, perhaps
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-10 17:29]:
> Do we need to have three different RAID packages in sarge?
>
> From the package description, it's only necessary for unpatched 2.2 kernels.
I agree that raidtools (v1) can probably go, but let's CC the old
maintainer to ask for comments.
* Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040610 09:40]:
> Do we need to have three different RAID packages in sarge?
>
> >From the package description, it's only necessary for unpatched 2.2 kernels.
>
> Given that we're trying to get rid of all 2.2 kernels, can we get rid of
> raidtools?
AFAIK we w
Response
---
Dear Customer,
Your question has NOT been submitted.
To submit a question to Lantronix Support, please click one of the links below:
Post-Sales:
http://ltxfaq.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/ltxfaq.cfg/php/enduser/ask.php
Pre-Sales:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 05:29:00PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> It's got RC bugs. I know someone was trying to get a sponsor for an upload
> recently on -devel.
I thought that was raidtools2. Or did I miss a message somewhere?
Either way, I vote 'yes' on getting rid of the raidtools package.
[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B!!(B
$B(B
$B$3$l$+$i$N!"[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|1_0J>eCy6b!!![$O!"[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B(,(,(B[$B<}F~3HBg$KI,FI!X2?8N9b3[<}F~$K$J$k!*(B
$B!Y(B]$B(,(,(B[$B>epJs$H(BPR$B$N3hMQ$GL\E*$N$?$a$N<}F~3HBg!*(,(B
Hi,
Do we need to have three different RAID packages in sarge?
>From the package description, it's only necessary for unpatched 2.2 kernels.
Given that we're trying to get rid of all 2.2 kernels, can we get rid of
raidtools?
It's got RC bugs. I know someone was trying to get a sponsor for an up
11 matches
Mail list logo