ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange took action on the message. The message
details were:
Sender = debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = Information
Scanning time = 05/12/2004 21:02:42
Engine/Pattern = 7.000-1004/889
Action taken on message:
The attachment Informatio
Hi there
I submitted this bug over three weeks ago, I included some analysis
and at least a hint of how the problem might be fixed but I have
seen no update from the maintainer.
If the maintainer of tftpd-hpa is too busy, is it possible to pass
this bug on to someone else? I have a couple of mach
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:19:44PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
>
> Data has also showed interest in taking over some of his packages, I
> can't recall which one right now, as I am still a little "out of
> service", (whas it apt-proxy?), and as friends of him, we'd like to
> mantain his packages if it's fi
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> The following packages have to be orphaned/adopted:
As I stated at [EMAIL PROTECTED], I intend to adopt lirc, I have not had
time to issue an ITA, since I am reading my email for the first time
since Monday morning.
This is because Last weekend Ranty and I joked a
lp Desk: Look on the yoursite MailScanner in
/var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20040512 (message i4CBi3W04464).
--
Postmaster
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:06:50AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I'm the current maintainer of setserial. I'm in the process of
> getting it adopted (because I do no longer need it, but has not
> started that yet). But before I do I'm asking if setserial is needed
> at all today?
If nothing else,
6 matches
Mail list logo
