Hi Gopal,
I just took a look at your package list[1], and I believe you maybe
should let go some of your packages. A very shallow look told me you
have 4 RC bugs, 8 of your packages have bugs closed by NMU you didn't
yet confirm by closing them by hand and/or uploading a new maintainer
version, an
Hello,
I sent Jérôme a message asking whether he'd be willing to sponsor
gwenview. In a burst of enthusiasm, he uploaded the (recompiled for
powerpc) package immediately. :)
The maintainer field was set for myself in that upload, so I guess I'm the
maintainer now. I hope that's not a problem.
Hello,
I have a new gwenview package essentially ready. I will contact my current
sponsor, Jérôme Marant, today, and see if he would be willing to sponsor
Gwenview as well. I'll post here once I have his reply.
Cheers,
Christopher Martin
On May 11, 2004 13:20, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Micha
* Michael Spanier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-11 18:54]:
> I'm the maintainer of gwenview, a kde image viewer.
> As i do not have that much free time to maintain the package, I hereby
> orphan this this package.
>
> Christopher Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has showed some
> interested in taking t
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of gwenview, a kde image viewer.
As i do not have that much free time to maintain the package, I hereby
orphan this this package.
Christopher Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has showed some
interested in taking the package over.
gwenview was a sponored upload by colin wats
The following packages have to be orphaned/adopted:
fpm
jslaunch
libirman
lirc
qvplay
visualos
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Buy your drug of choice, NO prescription required
Today's special: Free overnight Fedex delivery
Vicodin.$2.55/dose
Hydrocodone$2.17/dose
Xanax...$2.52/dose
Valium..$2.65/dose
Phentermine..$0.89/dose
Stock is limit
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 10:04:24AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> This doesn't really answer your question, but at Popcon
> http://popcon.debian.org/main/by_inst its stats are:
>
> #rank nameinst vote old recent no-files
>(max: 5050)
> 96setserial
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 09:06, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I'm the current maintainer of setserial. I'm in the process of
> getting it adopted (because I do no longer need it, but has not
> started that yet). But before I do I'm asking if setserial is needed
> at all today?
This doesn't really answer you
Hello
I'm the current maintainer of setserial. I'm in the process of
getting it adopted (because I do no longer need it, but has not
started that yet). But before I do I'm asking if setserial is needed
at all today?
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist --
10 matches
Mail list logo
