RE: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])

2004-05-02 Thread Rep.Hines
Dear Friend, I want to thank you for taking the time to email me. This response is simply an automatic reply and I will follow up with a direct response to your question or concern should you request one . Due to the high volume of messages I receive, I ask that you please include your name and ho

Software

2004-05-02 Thread dahinds
Microsoft Windows XP Professiomnal 2002 Retail price: $270.99 Our low PricZe: $50.00 You Save: $220.00 Adobe PhotoshJop 7.0 Retail price: $609.99 Our low Price: $60.00 You SavCe: $550.00 Microsoft Office XP Professional 2002 Retail price: $579.99 Our low Price: $60.00 You Savte: $510.0

Re: Makeing Debian more secure - sign binaries with elfsign?

2004-05-02 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:55:15AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > Heh, I don't know much more, just that prelinking busts the checksum of a > binary. I've had a quick look at the licence, and I think it's currently > unsuitable as DFSG-free, but I just dropped the upstream maintainer an email >

Fresh bug info for PTS

2004-05-02 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Hi Rapha?l, At http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~jeroen/pts.bugs.txt you can find fresh (pushed from spohr, directly regenerated) bug information for the PTS. New bugsummaries are moved over, so you should never get only a part of the file. Andreas Barth told me he knew where you fetched the bugstuff fro

Re: Makeing Debian more secure - sign binaries with elfsign?

2004-05-02 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 02:11:48AM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote: > > P.S: btw, regarding x509 - is there a Debian CA? I presume there has to be. db.debian.org has an SSL certificate... Andrew

Re: Makeing Debian more secure - sign binaries with elfsign?

2004-05-02 Thread Andreas Kotes
Heya, * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040503 01:58]: > On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:49:01AM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote: > > * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040503 01:36]: > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:25:59PM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote: > > > > What do you think? Signed binaries i

Re: Makeing Debian more secure - sign binaries with elfsign?

2004-05-02 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:49:01AM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote: > Heya, > > * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040503 01:36]: > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:25:59PM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote: > > > What do you think? Signed binaries instead of tools like tripwire or > > > aide et all? > > >

Re: Makeing Debian more secure - sign binaries with elfsign?

2004-05-02 Thread Andreas Kotes
Heya, * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040503 01:36]: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:25:59PM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote: > > What do you think? Signed binaries instead of tools like tripwire or > > aide et all? > > Sounds interesting. How does elfsign go with prelinking? I've got no idea, a

Re: Makeing Debian more secure - sign binaries with elfsign?

2004-05-02 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:25:59PM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote: > > What do you think? Signed binaries instead of tools like tripwire or > aide et all? Sounds interesting. How does elfsign go with prelinking? regards Andrew signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Newer bugs summary generating script

2004-05-02 Thread Andreas Barth
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040502 17:10]: > Please find attached a newers bugs-summary generating script to be run > for QA, which will generate bug summaries for the PTS, DDPO, and > potentially further use. > > I cannot check whether this runs fine as-is on merkel of course, >

Votre message pour ue01_200310 a ete rejete

2004-05-02 Thread SYMPA
=E0 R=E9sultats de l'analyse du courriel: MailScanner: Une balise =ABIFrame=BB non s=E9curitaire a =E9t=E9 trouv= =E9e dans le message HTML Information de rep=E9rage: the MailScanner:/var/spool/MailScanner/quarantin= e/20040502/i42IJXia031663 Pour tout renseignement compl=E9m

Re: Newer bugs summary generating script

2004-05-02 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 04:59:41PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Please find attached a newers bugs-summary generating script to be run > for QA, which will generate bug summaries for the PTS, DDPO, and > potentially further use. Oh, and place don't name it process-index, but 'generate-bug

Newer bugs summary generating script

2004-05-02 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Please find attached a newers bugs-summary generating script to be run for QA, which will generate bug summaries for the PTS, DDPO, and potentially further use. I cannot check whether this runs fine as-is on merkel of course, somebody else would need to check. Please make the generated files avail