Re: Reassign #226685 FTBFS: junit orig tarball missing

2004-04-24 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 01:20:37AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Shouldn't this bug be reassign to ftp.debian.org? > > > > IMHO, yes, ftp-master can fix this, or at least advice as how to fix it. > > > > Wasn't this discussed just a few day

Re: Reassign #226685 FTBFS: junit orig tarball missing

2004-04-24 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Shouldn't this bug be reassign to ftp.debian.org? > > IMHO, yes, ftp-master can fix this, or at least advice as how to fix it. > > Wasn't this discussed just a few days ago already, or is my memory failing? Yep, you are right, that's why I was

what is [EMAIL PROTECTED]@x conscious romances

2004-04-24 Thread Ashlar
Budapest diagrammed remove Hansel homeowner purges theaters multicast broil stretching antics Fuchsia commended mismatches Hoover tonic prophecies television modem accuser menacing jesting poppies suitors Hubert Improve overall $_p_e_r_m production receiver gutter encamp absorbing docked shells

NMU of gnome-pim in DELAYED/7-day, removing gnome-pim-conduits

2004-04-24 Thread Michael Banck
tags 201219 +pending thanks Hi, I've uploaded new gnome-pim packages to DELAYED/7-day. This is the changelog: gnome-pim (1.4.9-2.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * Dropped the gnome-pim-conduits package for now. The conduits are broken it seems (#160862 and #15703

Re: DD packages overview vs bugs

2004-04-24 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 10:05:34PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * GCS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040423 20:10]: > > I have just noticed, that on the summary page of my packages[1] the > > already closed bugs still shown in xmms-blursk. On the PTS page I can > > see that the bugs are closed, and will be

Re: Bug#239703: About to remove kernel-patch-2.2.20-p3

2004-04-24 Thread Andreas Barth
* Camm Maguire ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040423 23:40]: > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I agree on removing the package. So, if no-one disagrees, I'm going to > > reassign this bug to ftp.d.o next weekend. > At least some of the functionality in my 4 packages appears to be > missing fro