Decrease Kilograms At Once

2004-04-23 Thread Chante
Email is loading.. Image not loading? See message here. Stop all announcements. ICRVX.v57jk1pmh2T/L2RA41S4OaZ1ekDQ/1oSkvr0dn2rE/ bwybl elul, inr, nna . ntze qrcc yadu, ehe, vywlil . nytpm ilkqb sdfqf, mip, oaqmyb . khmi bwilj blbvqg, yrxg, tui . ignh wtb wxhk, cnud, mmwm . uulpqv zbpiu cxn,

Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Andreas Barth wrote: > Furthermore, even if it is removed, non-US is > not processed at the moment, so it wouldn't change anything. Unfortunately non-US really does need to start being processed. Is there anyone capable of doing that who isn't completely swamped? -- There are none so blind as t

Re: Bug#239703: About to remove kernel-patch-2.2.20-p3

2004-04-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! > > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I agree on removing the package. So, if no-one disagrees, I'm going to >> reassign this bug to ftp.d.o next weekend. >> > > At least some of the functionality in my 4 packages appears to be > missing

Re: Bug#239703: About to remove kernel-patch-2.2.20-p3

2004-04-23 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Camm Maguire wrote: > In > short, I have no objection to the removal of the packages unless their > presence would facilitate an update of the package contents to the > latest kernel, which I would like to effect, at least in the p3 and > raid cases. The security team has requested to trim down th

Re: Bug#239703: About to remove kernel-patch-2.2.20-p3

2004-04-23 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I agree on removing the package. So, if no-one disagrees, I'm going to > reassign this bug to ftp.d.o next weekend. > At least some of the functionality in my 4 packages appears to be missing from the latest 2.2 kernel. A simple c

Re: Reassign #226685 FTBFS: junit orig tarball missing

2004-04-23 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 04:27:08PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > Shouldn't this bug be reassign to ftp.debian.org? IMHO, yes, ftp-master can fix this, or at least advice as how to fix it. Wasn't this discussed just a few days ago alre

Reassign #226685 FTBFS: junit orig tarball missing

2004-04-23 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Shouldn't this bug be reassign to ftp.debian.org? junit is in main but tarball is in contrib. Cheers, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAiSe+4vzFZu62tMIRAtV1AK

Bug#245472: ftp.debian.org: [REMOVE] jdom source package

2004-04-23 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal thanks Please remove jdom sources because it has been renamed libjdom-java. Both provide libjdom-java but the new package does not provides libjdom-java-doc. This package can also be removed from the archive. Testing and Unstable are affected. Many thanks

Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-23 12:56]: > Well, really problematic is IMHO that gutenbrowser is actually not > part of main. Sorry that I can't tell you why at the moment, because > access to merkel is currently restricted. http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt [Date: Mon, 12

Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Andreas Barth
* Emanuele Rocca ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040423 12:25]: > * On 23-04-04 - 08:35, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > is there any reason that gutenbrowser is in non-US? > > If not I'd file a bug report to move it to main. > The reason was unzip, which gutenbrowser depends on. > http://bug

Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-23 12:16]: > Why is it still in non-US? Because it has not been removed yet. 214930: Please remove gutenbook from main & non-US and gutenbrowser from non-US -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jdom source package no more maintained

2004-04-23 Thread Andreas Barth
* Arnaud Vandyck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040423 12:40]: > Takashi changed the name of the source package but jdom still exists and > provides a libjdom-java package. > > Shouldn't jdom removed from the archives? Changing the name of the source package means that the maintianers has to file a bug rep

jdom source package no more maintained

2004-04-23 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I think there is a problem with jdom source package. http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=jdom&searchon=sourcenames&subword=1&version=all&release=all Source package jdom * stable (libs): 0.7b.20020216-4 Binar

Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Emanuele Rocca
* On 23-04-04 - 08:35, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is there any reason that gutenbrowser is in non-US? > If not I'd file a bug report to move it to main. The reason was unzip, which gutenbrowser depends on. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=109400 But now that unz

gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, is there any reason that gutenbrowser is in non-US? If not I'd file a bug report to move it to main. Kind regards Andreas.

SENDER ! Virus found in message from you !

2004-04-23 Thread tomas
You sent to user [EMAIL PROTECTED] message with VIRUS . == AVP Report: == document.pifinfected: I-Worm.NetSky.d document.pifmp/avpcheckWR4Q7F infected by virus I-Worm.NetSky.d is impossible. document.pifdeleted: I-Wor