Re: What about removing mozilla-snapshot from unstable as well?

2004-03-16 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:49:50AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Anthony Towns [2004-03-16 13:51]: > > > > But it is difficult for me(currently) to maintain two versions of > > > > mozilla. > > > > So, I'll orphan it... > > > Is anyone interested in maintaining a mozilla-snapshot package in >

Need some help with xirssi

2004-03-16 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi, I'm trying to rebuild xirssi with the maintainer set to the QA group, but it's not playing ball. Essential part of the build failure is: gcc-3.2 -O2 -g -Wall -o xirssi dialog-about.o gui.o gui-channel.o gui-colors.o gui-context-nick.o gui-context-url.o gui-entry.o gui-frame.o gui-itemlist.o

Re: Easily-fixed outstanding RC bugs

2004-03-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 07:33:22AM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > 229931: elisp-manual-ja needs to Build-Dep on emacs21, not emacs20. > Reported two months ago, explicit (trivial) patch has been > sitting there for two weeks. This one kind of worried me; the manual seems to be for emacs2

Easily-fixed outstanding RC bugs

2004-03-16 Thread Rob Weir
Just trawling through the BugScan output, I found a few easy-to-fix RC bugs that have had patches sitting around for a while. So, here goes: 233145: docbook-slides is missing a Build-Dep on xml-core. Open for a month, planned NMU last week did not eventuate. 232215: docbook-simple needs

Re: BSP Coordination

2004-03-16 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:41:02PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-16 14:14]: > > 1) revive the claims.cgi page. This would probably require syncing > > a file from a nonrestricted host to spohr. (Or perhaps > > Yeah, can you talk to AJ? Will try

Re: BSP Coordination

2004-03-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-16 14:14]: > 1) revive the claims.cgi page. This would probably require syncing > a file from a nonrestricted host to spohr. (Or perhaps Yeah, can you talk to AJ? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BSP Coordination

2004-03-16 Thread Andreas Barth
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040316 14:25]: > As noted in the announcement there is currently no central BSP > coordination page for bug squashing parties. Currently I see > two ways to implement one again: > > 1) revive the claims.cgi page. This would probably require syncing > a file

BSP Coordination

2004-03-16 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Hi. As noted in the announcement there is currently no central BSP coordination page for bug squashing parties. Currently I see two ways to implement one again: 1) revive the claims.cgi page. This would probably require syncing a file from a nonrestricted host to spohr. (Or perhaps setting up the

Re: Better coordinating when pages update?

2004-03-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:02:47PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > So, http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/all.html > and http://packages.qa.debian.org/ > and http://bts.turmzimmer.net/ > all show packages as being in 'testing' which aren't, because they were > removed on the last run. >

Re: Better coordinating when pages update?

2004-03-16 Thread Björn Stenberg
Nathanael Nerode wrote: > So, http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/all.html > and http://packages.qa.debian.org/ > and http://bts.turmzimmer.net/ > all show packages as being in 'testing' which aren't, because they were > removed on the last run. > > Perhaps there's some way to schedule t

Re: What about removing mozilla-snapshot from unstable as well?

2004-03-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-03-16 Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:42:25PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: [...] > > Is anyone interested in maintaining a mozilla-snapshot package in > > experimental? > Err, presumably it should just be called "mozilla" in that case? I think mozilla-snapshot and moz

Re: Let's remove cl-uncommomsql

2004-03-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 230968 ftp.debian.org retitle 230968 Please remove cl-uncommonsql thanks * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-16 18:32]: > Release critical bug #217709 > 141 days old > Dead upstream (according to #217709) > Orphaned Yeah. The previous maintainers writes in #217709, "If these p

Re: What about removing mozilla-snapshot from unstable as well?

2004-03-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Anthony Towns [2004-03-16 13:51]: > > > But it is difficult for me(currently) to maintain two versions of > > > mozilla. > > > So, I'll orphan it... > > Is anyone interested in maintaining a mozilla-snapshot package in > > experimental? > > Err, presumably it should just be called "mozilla" in

Let's remove cl-uncommomsql

2004-03-16 Thread Andrew Pollock
Release critical bug #217709 > 141 days old Dead upstream (according to #217709) Orphaned signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: What about removing mozilla-snapshot from unstable as well?

2004-03-16 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:42:25PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > I agree it sohuld probably be removed and a mozilla CVS or > > > mozilla-snapshot package uploaded to experimental. > > I think so too. it should be moved to experimental. > > But it is difficult for me(currently) to maintain t

Re: Hanno Wagner MIA (missed in action?)

2004-03-16 Thread Hanno Wagner
Hi, sorry, it took me quite a while to get a new package of qps (yes, quite a _lot_ of time), but yesterday evening I uploaded a qt2-version of qps. With some luck I will be able to upload tonight a package with qt3-support. Ciao, Hanno (if you want to respond, please put me in copy since I do no