Re: Zephaniah E. Hull (warp@debian.org) MIA ?

2004-03-14 Thread Grant Bowman
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040314 16:56]: > * Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 13:34]: > > Is Zephaniah E. Hull ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is MIA? > > his last upload is nearly one year ago. > > > > He maintains GPM which is an important piece of software. The sid > > version i

Re: What about removing mozilla-snapshot from unstable as well?

2004-03-14 Thread Takuo KITAME
2004/03/15 (月) 06:03 に Martin Michlmayr さんは書きました: > * Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 09:43]: > > Lastest upload of this package was on 2003-10-02 (version > > 0.0.20031002.13.trunk-1). Since then, mozilla had 6 releases, so I think > > there is no need for such an ancient cvs releas

f allegiant

2004-03-14 Thread Ashley Hamlin
  The Onl*ine Super Sav`ings Pha'rmacy Vic-odin - Xa}nax - Vi^agra - C(ialis - Lev|itra Save Money (upto 7O%) Sa}ve Time (Overnight Shipping) No Doc:tors Appointment Needed No Presc.ription Required Do]ctor & FDA

Hanno Wagner MIA?

2004-03-14 Thread Nathanael Nerode
One package (qps), last maintainer upload in the year 2000. This package is still a qt2 package compiled with gcc-2.95 (despite what it says in some of the NMUs). It has a standards version of 2.5.0 and the postinst sets a /usr/doc symlink. -- Make sure your vote will count. http://www.verified

Re: Packages overview: GPG key id not found!

2004-03-14 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:44:26PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-15 09:22]: > > The error "GPG key id not found!" message is displayed at [0]. It was > > the result of using a subkey of the main key, 0x1880283c. > > > > My last two packages

Re: Packages overview: GPG key id not found!

2004-03-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-15 09:22]: > The error "GPG key id not found!" message is displayed at [0]. It was > the result of using a subkey of the main key, 0x1880283c. > > My last two packages uploaded recently have been signed properly with > my main key 0x1880283c.

Packages overview: GPG key id not found!

2004-03-14 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
Hello Martin, The error "GPG key id not found!" message is displayed at [0]. It was the result of using a subkey of the main key, 0x1880283c. My last two packages uploaded recently have been signed properly with my main key 0x1880283c. What can be done to make the page at [0] refer to my key 0x1

Re: Jean-Marc Bourdaret probably MIA

2004-03-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-14 21:33]: > > Last upload 2002. > > Three packages: > [...] > > Thanks, I contacted him. Email bounces, packages orphaned. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jean-Marc Bourdaret probably MIA

2004-03-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-13 03:10]: > No GPG key according to qa.debian.org/developer.php. That's wrong. > Last upload 2002. > Three packages: [...] Thanks, I contacted him. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: David Martinez Moreno MIA or busy?

2004-03-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-13 03:06]: > Last upload October. > > xmovie (contrib) has been pretty seriously ignored -- notably bug 140474, > but also all the others. :-p Technically, it has no RC bugs, but I'm betting > that's because nobody's using it. Perhaps he'd rather

Re: Possibly remove libdbmusic and kmusicdb (or give them some love)

2004-03-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 229918 ftp.debian.org retitle 229918 Please remove libdbmusic reassign 229920 ftp.debian.org retitle 229920 Please remove kmusicdb thanks * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-12 21:23]: > It might be worthwhile to remove libdbmusic and kmusicdb, unless > someone can give them a

Re: Orp in bad shape -- worth keeping or not?

2004-03-14 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 09:10:53PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-13 12:03]: > > I looked into this a while ago - it appears to have been abandoned by > > upstream. It's probably possible to fix it to use TLS instead of > > peering inside glibc 2.2 inte

Re: Orp in bad shape -- worth keeping or not?

2004-03-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-13 12:03]: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:18:39PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > Orp is very broken and has been for quite a while. > > (for example, bugs 128732, 185881, 236118, 168536) > > I looked into this a while ago - it appears to have been abando

Re: What about removing mozilla-snapshot from unstable as well?

2004-03-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 09:43]: > Lastest upload of this package was on 2003-10-02 (version > 0.0.20031002.13.trunk-1). Since then, mozilla had 6 releases, so I think > there is no need for such an ancient cvs release, even in unstable. > Moreover, I have the feeling that t

Re: Zephaniah E. Hull (warp@debian.org) MIA ?

2004-03-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 13:34]: > Is Zephaniah E. Hull ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is MIA? > his last upload is nearly one year ago. > > He maintains GPM which is an important piece of software. The sid > version is the same as the woody version and has some problematic bugs. > Al

Symantec AntiVirus/Filtering detected a violation/virus in a document you authored.

2004-03-14 Thread bwd10 . blueteam . ch/BlueTeam/CH
Please contact your system administrator. The infected component in the scanned document was deleted. Violation Information: The attachment your_details.pif contained the virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was deleted.

Blocked Attachment

2004-03-14 Thread notification
Please do not respond to this e-mail. This is an unmonitored account. --- One or more of the attachments that you have sent in the following message was blocked by our mail system. Research In Motion does not allow transmission of the following type