Re: Orp in bad shape -- worth keeping or not?

2004-03-13 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:18:39PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Orp is very broken and has been for quite a while. > (for example, bugs 128732, 185881, 236118, 168536) I looked into this a while ago - it appears to have been abandoned by upstream. It's probably possible to fix it to use TLS

Jean-Marc Bourdaret probably MIA

2004-03-13 Thread Nathanael Nerode
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> No GPG key according to qa.debian.org/developer.php. Last upload 2002. Three packages: twin: Has been seriously out of date w/r/t upstream for at least a year (#184746) twutils: Hasn't undergone c102 transition gtans: comment-free bug #143999 -- Make sure your vote will

David Martinez Moreno MIA or busy?

2004-03-13 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Last upload October. xmovie (contrib) has been pretty seriously ignored -- notably bug 140474, but also all the others. :-p Technically, it has no RC bugs, but I'm betting that's because nobody's using it. Perhaps he'd rather drop it? -- Make sure your vote will count. http://www.verifiedvoti