On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 02:17:11PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > I'm the annoying person that filed so many bugs on your qca-tls package :)
> >
> > I wonder if you need some help in fixing them. If you are busy right
> > now I could do a NMU if yo
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-27 14:14]:
> The question is: Should we wait for someone to adopt it or remove it
> from unstable? (I would go for removal)
Removal is probably the best, but please give doko a few days to
comment since he knows the status of GNUstep. Actually, ask
Adrian Bunk escribió:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
...
It's a common misunderstanding that automatic tools would be able to
solve every problem.
Automatic tools are inhumen. And the wor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 02:17:11PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> I'm the annoying person that filed so many bugs on your qca-tls package :)
>
> I wonder if you need some help in fixing them. If you are busy right
> now I could do a NMU if you want, fixing all the outstanding bugs.
>
> This wou
Hi,
I'm the annoying person that filed so many bugs on your qca-tls package :)
I wonder if you need some help in fixing them. If you are busy right
now I could do a NMU if you want, fixing all the outstanding bugs.
This would include making qca-tls a non-native package among other
things, also
[CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED], as he has NMUed twice]
Hi.
While going through the WNPP bug list I found gsdict:
It has a RC bug that makes it completly unusable (I can
reproduce the bug here in a current sid chroot)
The maintainer also states that the program is dead upstream
(and at least the downloa
6 matches
Mail list logo
