Removal of Package g5

2004-02-25 Thread Alexander Winston
I hereby suggest that the package named "g5" be removed from the Debian archive. I previously considered adopting this orphaned package and bringing it back from the dead, but now I wish to just let it rest in peace. :) The package depends on libgtk1.2 and the upstream sources have disappeared. Ma

Bug#123416 acknowledged by developer (already packaged)

2004-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #123416: RFP: treecc -- Treecc assists in compiler development by managing code generation to handle abstract syntax trees, which was filed against the wnpp package. It has been closed by one of the developers, namely Robert Lemmen <[EMA

Re: xemacs21 status

2004-02-25 Thread Jérôme Marant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) writes: > xemacs21, xemacs21-gnome-mule, xemacs21-mule, and xemacs21-packages have > RC bugs, some open for a long time with patches. > > The maintainer has uploaded new versions (after a little prodding) -- > without fixing the bugs. I think most of them

xemacs21 status

2004-02-25 Thread Nathanael Nerode
xemacs21, xemacs21-gnome-mule, xemacs21-mule, and xemacs21-packages have RC bugs, some open for a long time with patches. The maintainer has uploaded new versions (after a little prodding) -- without fixing the bugs. I'm not sure what to do here, but from a QA standpoint this is not good. Pe

Re: Remove pgeasy from testing

2004-02-25 Thread Andreas Barth
* Martin Pitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040225 11:10]: > So I would vote for removing it from testing, but to keep it in > unstable for a while. > > What do you think? What shall I do in this case? Bug Report against > ftp.d.o or qa.d.o? Normally: Speak with the release-team on [EMAIL PROTECTED] In t

Re: Remove pgeasy from testing

2004-02-25 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:56:43AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > What do you think? What shall I do in this case? Bug Report against > ftp.d.o or qa.d.o? For removals from testing only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the way to go, AFAIK. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djp

Remove pgeasy from testing

2004-02-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi QA! The source package pgeasy has no proper copyright (please see #227793); its homepage says it is BSD, but there is not a single copyright statement in the source tarball itself. Its upstream author promised to release a new version some weeks ago, but did not report back so far. Would it b