Re: Consider removing iraf from testing

* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-30 17:47]: > Is it worth keeping iraf-ibin? It only suggests iraf, but I thought > I'd ask. Got bored with waiting, so I requested its removal. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mnemo and nag

* David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-07 20:32]: > Sorry for being unclear. The packages are installable, it's just that > they do not work at all after installation. The relevant bugs are: > > o mnemo: 191219, 214455, 214458 > o nag: 214451, 214452, 214453 Can someone please check if

Re: Rene Weber MIA?

* Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-09 12:40]: > I've tried to contact him because of old dailystrips packages, but no > reply in more or less one year... Sorry, I wanted to reply to this a few days ago but got distracted. Yes, there are quite a few wishlist bugs requesting new upstre

Re: a2ps borders problem after upgrade

On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 11:26:35PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:12:33PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > > There is no "new way"... as you'll note if you actually bother to look at > > the BTS, there are numerous bugs filed since the maintainer uploaded a > > broken CVS version a

Re: a2ps borders problem after upgrade

On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:12:33PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:58:16PM -0500, Petr Vanek wrote: > > i am trying to find out what happened with a2ps in unstable. recently > > after upgrade it does not react to command line switches like > > --borders=no , so i always print