Re: MIA (or derelict) maintainers list

2003-12-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Il lun, 2003-12-15 alle 15:01, Colin Watson ha scritto: > Active-but-busy developers would rightly take > exception to being called missing-in-action; I don't think the term > should be thrown around too lightly. This is true, but it is also true that there is no shame in orphaning some of your pa

Re: MIA (or derelict) maintainers list

2003-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > Can I just suggest that the "wanting to help" should come well before > talk of being MIA? Active-but-busy developers would rightly take > exception to being called missing-in-action; I don't think the term > should be thrown around too lightly. You might

Re: MIA (or derelict) maintainers list

2003-12-15 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:16:11AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > If I look at jhead (an other package of you) I see some responses > from more than one year ago but the bugs stay unclosed. This > is normally a sign for beeing MIA - which is no shame at all. I just > wanted to help. Can I just su

Re: MIA (or derelict) maintainers list

2003-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Dave Baker wrote: > Andreas - I don't know where the problem is. You've claimed several times > to have been unable to reach me, yet the only emails I receive are the > complaints. This is strange. > I replied the last time (the NMU for curator) but received no > response. I