Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Progeny said they're going to work on discover2, and Gaudenz Steinlin > has volunteered as well. Ok, fantastic. Are they planning to get it done in time for release, or are some cleanup uploads of the old package necessary? I'm tr

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-04 23:20]: > > * discover: Orphan & QA-upload. Its current maintainer(s) are simply not > > p.s. I don't know how capable I am of taking this package, but I'm > willing to try and adopt it and work on this bug if no one more > qualified steps up Proge

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:51:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > * discover: Orphan & QA-upload. Its current maintainer(s) are simply not > maintaining it. (#169264) Could this be because they're working on discover2? I thought that discover2 was what d-i was going to be using. - David Nus

Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Of the bugs noted in my RC bug trawl two months ago: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2003/debian-qa-200310/msg00037.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2003/debian-qa-200310/msg00038.html Some (many?) are still open and RC on packages in sarge. That was a very conservative RC bug trawl. With

Re: addressbook

2003-12-04 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hello, I can only assume that you've picked up my name from the latest changelog entry for the addressbook package. I made a recent QA upload of this package, just to change who was recorded as the maintainer. I'm not planning of actively maintaining this package. What I suggest you do is file a