* Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-19 12:07]:
> A few days ago, I asked (debian-admin) for a couple of packages to be
> installed in the ia64 sarge chroot. No response so far. Is there
> another avenue?
They are usually pretty fast with this. Just wait a few more days, it
was the weeken
* Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-19 23:32]:
> Is d-qa the right mailing list to ask such questions? Or should I
> rather ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably -mentors, but I don't mind them being asked here if it's not
excessive.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:32:44PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> When a package is uploaded into experimental, does this trigger the
> bug closing mechanism of the changelog?
katie marks them fixed-in-experimental only.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Hi!
When a package is uploaded into experimental, does this trigger the
bug closing mechanism of the changelog? Developer's Reference 5.8.4
does not make this entirely clear. IMHO it would be really bad if that
really was so.
Is d-qa the right mailing list to ask such questions? Or should I
rathe
Hi,
>* new upstream. built with gcc-3.2
>* moved to yada
>* closes: #96323
Please write sensible changelog entries. This isn't.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
-
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 07:51:12PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 19:11]:
> > #189751: lanoche: depends on non-existent xviddetect
> >
> > I wonder if this is a good candidate to be dropped since removing
> > the dependency on xviddetect is more than
* Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 19:11]:
> #189751: lanoche: depends on non-existent xviddetect
>
> I wonder if this is a good candidate to be dropped since removing
> the dependency on xviddetect is more than a packaging issue.
The maintainer agrees. He says lshw is a good alternat
7 matches
Mail list logo
