Martin Pitt, 2003-10-08 19:20:18 +0200 :
> But since IANADD (yet) I would need a sponsor for every upload; in
> the last weeks I've sent quite a bunch of bug followups which were
> only scarcely answered, thus half-MIA maintainers might not be the
> best sponsor candidates...
>
> Can I still be of
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:08:07 -0700
Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alioth has been a terrific resource for me in this regard. Using it and
> dpatch, I'm easily able to co-maintain packages, maintain bugs, and keep
> releases in check with multiple developers.
>
> I'd highly recomme
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
There are some developers who are clearly too busy to maintain their
packages properly, but yet cannot be considered inactive enough so
that their packages should be given away. I'd like to have a group of
people who are willing to help those developers out by co-maintai
Hi!
Am 2003-10-09 1:45 +1000 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:
> There are some developers who are clearly too busy to maintain their
> packages properly, but yet cannot be considered inactive enough so
> that their packages should be given away. I'd like to have a group of
> people who are willing to h
Hello Andreas,
No, I'm still alive, only came back from holidays yesterday. I'll need
a few days to go through my mailbox, so I intend to upload the next
version of cyrus-sasl2 this weekend.
Regards,
Dima.
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Dima Barsky wrote:
> No, I'm still alive, only came back from holidays yesterday. I'll need
> a few days to go through my mailbox, so I intend to upload the next
> version of cyrus-sasl2 this weekend.
Sorry for the noise.
thanks, cu andreas
There are some developers who are clearly too busy to maintain their
packages properly, but yet cannot be considered inactive enough so
that their packages should be given away. I'd like to have a group of
people who are willing to help those developers out by co-maintaining
their packages for a w
* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-08 17:15]:
> Browsing over the RC bugs list I ended up checking cyrus-sasl2's page
> on packages.qa.debian.org. According to the public[1] echelon info
> (Last modified) dima was last seen on 2003/08/13 12:49:13 UTC and most
> of the packages have been
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-22 07:58]:
> libglibwww-ssl1 has an RC bug but I think we do not really need this
> package any more. It resides in non-US but should be moved to main and
> libglibwww1 should be compiled with SSL support. This remove just would
> reduce the number of
Hello,
Browsing over the RC bugs list I ended up checking cyrus-sasl2's page
on packages.qa.debian.org. According to the public[1] echelon info
(Last modified) dima was last seen on 2003/08/13 12:49:13 UTC and most
of the packages have been NMU'd at least once.
I am asking because libsasl2 is prio
* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-04 04:19]:
> Its maintainer appears to have only the name "Viral". Some of the other
> packages by the maintainer at least claim that the maintainer is "Viral Shah".
I orphaned his mosix packages a few months ago; at that time, he said
he'd maintain
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-22 07:58]:
> libglibwww-ssl1 has an RC bug but I think we do not really need this
> package any more. It resides in non-US but should be moved to main and
> libglibwww1 should be compiled with SSL support. This remove just would
> reduce the number of
12 matches
Mail list logo
