Re: A 'fixed upstream' BTS tag

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:29:16AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Sounds like the 'fixed-upstream' tag added a few days ago. > > This tag seems to be not on http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags, I committed a description a few hours ago. That'll

Re: A 'fixed upstream' BTS tag

Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sounds like the 'fixed-upstream' tag added a few days ago. This tag seems to be not on http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags, and I've seen nothing about it .. have you a link to something describing it ? Cheers, Sebastien Bacher

Re: A 'fixed upstream' BTS tag

On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 09:46:36PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > I haven't found any way in the BTS to tell that a bug has been fixed > upstream (usually CVS HEAD). Sounds like the 'fixed-upstream' tag added a few days ago. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A 'fixed upstream' BTS tag

"Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 09:46:36PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: >> I haven't found any way in the BTS to tell that a bug has been fixed >> upstream (usually CVS HEAD). There are currently: > [cut] >> How about adding a new tag? Or any other idea?

Re: A 'fixed upstream' BTS tag

On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 09:46:36PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > I haven't found any way in the BTS to tell that a bug has been fixed > upstream (usually CVS HEAD). There are currently: [cut] > How about adding a new tag? Or any other idea? Isn't an ``upstream'' tag for it? Cheers Artur --

A 'fixed upstream' BTS tag

Hi, I haven't found any way in the BTS to tell that a bug has been fixed upstream (usually CVS HEAD). There are currently: - patch: but I may not want to backport every CVS fixed bug because the bug is not that important - pending: but it imply that the fix is going to be uploaded soon How abou