Re: Howto tackle RC-bugs (and perhaps remove packages)?

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:35:37PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > The RC-bugs (and the packages they belong to) can IMHO be qualified > into different categories (together with the IMHO appropriate action): [...] > 2. RC-bug has an easy-to-use patch for some time, but there was no > upload in the

Re: QA Upload for dotfile

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:59:40PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I've prepared a QA Upload for dotfile, that fixes the RC bug against > this package. > > You can find the new source at http://www.lichtenheld.de/debian/ > and I would be happy if someone would upload it. Any chance of getting t

Re: gmail QA upload

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 05:53:49PM +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > is ready a qa upload for gmail which closes the serious bug against it > (FTBFS); the package is lintian and linda clean and it's available here: > http://members.xoom.it/debian01 > > I'm not a DD, so I'm looking for a sponsor. Pat

Re: Bug#202590: marked as done (PTS: auto-unsubscribe after a certain time frame)

[ Voluntarily leaving lots of context for devscripts's maintainer ] Le Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:18:09PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System écrivait: > > > When doing an NMU the developer's reference suggests subscribing to the > > > PTS in case bugs were introduced by the NMU. I would like have a sp

Howto tackle RC-bugs (and perhaps remove packages)?

Hi, tackling the RC-bugs is certainly a important TODO-item. I want to do this for the bugs I can tackle, but I have a few questions. The RC-bugs (and the packages they belong to) can IMHO be qualified into different categories (together with the IMHO appropriate action): 1. Package with RC-bugs

Bug#202590: marked as done (PTS: auto-unsubscribe after a certain time frame)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:16:47 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#202590: PTS: auto-unsubscribe after a certain time frame has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#202590: PTS: auto-unsubscribe after a certain time frame

Le Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Martin Godisch écrivait: > Package: qa.debian.org > Version: N/A; reported 2003-07-23 > Severity: wishlist > > When doing an NMU the developer's reference suggests subscribing to the > PTS in case bugs were introduced by the NMU. I would like have a specia

gmail QA upload

Hi, is ready a qa upload for gmail which closes the serious bug against it (FTBFS); the package is lintian and linda clean and it's available here: http://members.xoom.it/debian01 I'm not a DD, so I'm looking for a sponsor. Best regards, -- Emanuele Rocca - 1024D/EAF19B60

Re: Orphaning slocate?

* Andreas Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030723 16:20]: > Afaict slocate should be orphaned, the last maintainer upload was > 2.6-1, on Thu, 14 Jun 2001, since then there have been 5 NMUs by > different developers. According to #194037 there is a ITA since 20 May 2003, by Kevin Lindsay <[EMAIL PROTE

Orphaning slocate?

Hello, Afaict slocate should be orphaned, the last maintainer upload was 2.6-1, on Thu, 14 Jun 2001, since then there have been 5 NMUs by different developers. slocate won't be caught by any scripts searching for this because the last NMU used an incorrect version-number labelling it as maintainer

QA Upload for dotfile

Hi. I've prepared a QA Upload for dotfile, that fixes the RC bug against this package. You can find the new source at http://www.lichtenheld.de/debian/ and I would be happy if someone would upload it. There is also a bug to switch to po-debconf (#200115) but there are some problems left (see bug