Re: Bug#178525: looking for help building xdelta2 with g++ 3.3

2003-06-11 Thread Yann Dirson
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:21:35PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote: > os << std::setbase(16) << 132; Ah OK, I was also pointed to: os << std::setw(4) << std::hex << 132 << std::dec; Unfortunately, that will make the code much longer and much less readable. And there are also uses of ostrstream::v

Re: Bug#178525: looking for help building xdelta2 with g++ 3.3

2003-06-11 Thread Philip Martin
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I could even not switch to hex output in a sample program #include #include #include #include int main(void) { std::ostringstream os; os << std::setbase(16) << 132; std::cout << os.str() << "\n"; } -- Philip Martin

Re: Bug#178525: looking for help building xdelta2 with g++ 3.3

2003-06-11 Thread Yann Dirson
Well, next stop: the code makes use of the ostream::form() GNU extension, which has been removed. There seem to be no replacement in the standard. I tried to play with std::ostringstream, which seems to require some heavy manipulations involving ostringstream::setf() and such - however, I could

Re: getting rid of sh dependency problems

2003-06-11 Thread Jordi Mallach
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > It's in /cvs/qa, module data, debcheck/debcheck. Committed. Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key inform

Re: getting rid of sh dependency problems

2003-06-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 02:02:07PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > Does this need to be committed to CVS or something, or is the copy of > debcheck in klecker the one true copy? It's in /cvs/qa, module data, debcheck/debcheck. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: getting rid of sh dependency problems

2003-06-11 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-06-11 14:02]: > Does this need to be committed to CVS or something, or is the copy of > debcheck in klecker the one true copy? CVS... -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

getting rid of sh dependency problems

2003-06-11 Thread Jordi Mallach
Hello, I have removed the sh architecture from the debcheck script, to get rid of these many warnings/errors about dependency problems in this non-existant architecture. If anyone knows that this will break things, beat me up and revert the change :) Does this need to be committed to CVS or somet

Re: Orphaned packages (part 1): obsolete

2003-06-11 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Andrew! You wrote: > [Next time: orphaned packages with RC bugs] A list of those is already available at http://master.debian.org/~bas/wbos.html -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7