On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:33:01PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > xanim
> > xanim-modules
> > - non-free, and effectively obsoleted by xine
>
> I suspect we still have quite a few users using this, based on
> debian-user traffic. Then again, we have quite a few users still u
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> xanim
> xanim-modules
> - non-free, and effectively obsoleted by xine
I suspect we still have quite a few users using this, based on
debian-user traffic. Then again, we have quite a few users still using
xv..
--
see shy jo
pgpotZy07658f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 01:20:57AM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:05:10PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > suidmanager
> > - transition package, only useful when upgrading potato systems
>
> I think that this package should be in distro as long as potato is availa
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:05:10PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> suidmanager
> - transition package, only useful when upgrading potato systems
I think that this package should be in distro as long as potato is available
as oldstable. That means it should be in sarge (to make possible upgrade
fro
I'm making a series of passes over the list of orphaned packages,
looking for ones which can be removed.
This first list is comprised of those packages which are now
completely obsolete, for one reason or another. Unless anybody can
think of a good reason for keeping them, I intend to ask ftp-mast
* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-06-09 13:37]:
> > not changed. And the result is depressing... see for yourself:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/~tbm/base_bugs.png
>
> What kind of bugs did you include? All non-wishlist?
All (including wishlist).
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo