Re: wnpp ITP ping and cleanup

Hi Martin! You wrote: > You sent the pings to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but this will > not reach the bug submitter... Yeah, I know :-(( See my "I fucked up" mail. -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7

Re: wnpp ITP ping and cleanup

* Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-28 21:55]: > The bugs below were pinged (pung?). If no response is recorded in > the BTS in, say, a months from now, I'll also retitle them to RFPs. You sent the pings to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but this will not reach the bug submitter... -- Martin Michlm

Bug#115368: Info received (was Renaming ITP of xmlrpclib (#115368))

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you wish to cont

Bug#96103: Info received (was Renaming ITP of protux (#96103))

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you wish to cont

Bug#112118: Info received (was Renaming ITP of python-visual (#112118))

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you wish to cont

Bug#111167: Info received (was Renaming ITP of loop-aes (#111167))

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you wish to cont

Bug#94371: Info received (was Renaming ITP of netramet (#94371))

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you wish to cont

Bug#112478: Info received (was Renaming ITP of thoteditor (#112478))

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you wish to cont

Bug#97197: Info received (was Renaming ITP of freeside (#97197))

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you wish to cont

wnpp ITP ping and cleanup

Hi! I've waded through some old (>1y open) wnpp ITP bugs. I've retitled the following bugs to RFPs, because they were pinged and there was no response: 94371 RFP: NeTraMet -- accounting meter 96103 RFP: protux -- ProTools-like Digital Audio Workstation 97197 RFP: freeside -- billing and ac

Processed: Renaming ITP of python-visual (#112118)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 112118 RFP: python-visual -- A Python library for 3d visualization Bug#112118: ITP: python-visual -- A Python library for 3d visualization Changed Bug title. > severity 112118 wishlist Bug#112118: RFP: python-visual -- A Python library for 3d v

Processed: Renaming ITP of protux (#96103)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 96103 RFP: protux -- ProTools-like Digital Audio Workstation Bug#96103: ITP: protux -- ProTools-like Digital Audio Workstation Changed Bug title. > severity 96103 wishlist Bug#96103: RFP: protux -- ProTools-like Digital Audio Workstation Severi

Processed: Renaming ITP of netramet (#94371)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 94371 RFP: NeTraMet -- accounting meter Bug#94371: ITP: NeTraMet -- accounting meter Changed Bug title. > severity 94371 wishlist Bug#94371: RFP: NeTraMet -- accounting meter Severity set to `wishlist'. > submitter 94371 debian-qa@lists.debian

Processed: Renaming ITP of loop-aes (#111167)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 67 RFP: loop-aes -- AES cipher loadable Linux kernel module Bug#67: ITP: loop-aes -- AES cipher loadable Linux kernel module Changed Bug title. > severity 67 wishlist Bug#67: RFP: loop-aes -- AES cipher loadable Linux kernel mod

Processed: Renaming ITP of freeside (#97197)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 97197 RFP: freeside -- billing and account admin package for ISP's Bug#97197: ITP: freeside -- billing and account admin package for ISP's Changed Bug title. > severity 97197 wishlist Bug#97197: RFP: freeside -- billing and account admin packag

Processed: Renaming ITP of xmlrpclib (#115368)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 115368 RFP: xmlrpclib -- Python implementation of the XML-RPC protocol Bug#115368: ITP: xmlrpclib -- Python implementation of the XML-RPC protocol Changed Bug title. > severity 115368 wishlist Bug#115368: RFP: xmlrpclib -- Python implementation

Processed: Renaming ITP of thoteditor (#112478)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 112478 RFP: thoteditor -- customizable editor for structured documents Bug#112478: ITP: thoteditor -- customizable editor for structured documents Changed Bug title. > severity 112478 wishlist Bug#112478: RFP: thoteditor -- customizable editor

Re: Removing bug?

Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I think we should make some preperations to remove bug from Debian > and tell users to use reportbug. Are there still any features in > bug which are missing in reportbug? What remains to be done to get > rid of bug? bug has hardly any incompatabilities with reportbug,

Re: Removing bug?

On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 05:01:41PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I think we should make some preperations to remove bug from Debian > and tell users to use reportbug. Are there still any features in > bug which are missing in reportbug? What remains to be done to get > rid of bug? Remove seve

Removing bug?

I think we should make some preperations to remove bug from Debian and tell users to use reportbug. Are there still any features in bug which are missing in reportbug? What remains to be done to get rid of bug? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tool to orphan packages

I've written a small tool which generates templates to file proper WNPP bugs. This might be of interest to some people here... the script is called wnpp-orphan and is in klecker:/org/qa.debian.org/mia >From /org/qa.debian.org/mia/README Orphaning a package --- If a maintainer h