new boot-floppies for testing

2002-04-02 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Until the new 3.0.22 boot-floppies is installed in the archive for testing, I've put up at least an i386 build (my build, not the official one) and PowerPC version of the boot-floppies for testing. http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/woody/main/ I hope to get SPARC up there soon (again,

Re: woody

2002-04-02 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:07:54AM -0800, Nick Jacobs wrote: > However, in the absence of such statistics, surely > the number of uninstallable packages by > architecture is some indicator of the unreadiness > of woody on that architecture. No, it's not. For potato, eg, arm released with roughly s

Re: woody

2002-04-02 Thread Colin Watson
[Bah. Nick mailed me and the list separately with the same reply, so I assumed he'd replied privately and sent this privately in return ...] On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:03:48AM -0800, Nick Jacobs wrote: > --- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm afraid you misunderstand what that list is

Re: woody

2002-04-02 Thread Nick Jacobs
--- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 12:47:10PM -0800, Nick Jacobs > wrote: > > You simply have the facts wrong - none of those > packages have > > RELEASE-CRITICAL bugs for i386. I refer you to the list > of > > release-critical bugs at > > > >http://ftp-master.de

Re: BSP?

2002-04-02 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:15:53 -0600 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:20:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Isn't it about time for another BSP? It's been a month; I see quite a > > lot of RC bugs in the bts with patches. > > That might be worthwhile. Any QA people