FYI: I uploaded a version of netmaze that fixed this. I had to redefine
some cpp targets that imake used, but it seems to work now.
-- John
On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 05:15 AM, Tille, Andreas wrote:
On 1 Feb 2002, John Goerzen wrote:
Just s/ComplexProgramTarget/ComplexProgramTargetNo
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 22:52:15 +0100
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > if people find this is good enough I'll file a wishlist on
> > developers-reference
>
> Oh, just commit it, I really don't think Adam will mind... OTOH if you don't
> have commit rights to that tree, let me know and I w
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Further to my previous message, I now have a debian package of wily which
> lintian appears to accept. Accordingly, I have advanced the package version
> by 0.1 (to 0.3). Please can you advise me where I should send the patch?
Heh. You a
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:34:47 +
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to revive the wily package. How can I help to do this? I am
> not a debian developer, but I have built many packages for use by past and
> current employers. wily is a very useful editor in daily use he
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Further to my previous message, I now have a debian package of wily which
> lintian appears to accept. Accordingly, I have advanced the package version
> by 0.1 (to 0.3). Please can you advise me where I should send the patch?
You should
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 04:32:47PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
>
> +Dealing with unreachable maintainers
> +
> +If you notice that a package is lacking maintenance, you should
> +make sure the maintainer is active and will continue to work on
> +their packages. Try contacting th
Further to my previous message, I now have a debian package of wily which
lintian appears to accept. Accordingly, I have advanced the package version
by 0.1 (to 0.3). Please can you advise me where I should send the patch?
Thanks.
--
MJR
Hi,
I would like to revive the wily package. How can I help to do this? I am
not a debian developer, but I have built many packages for use by past and
current employers. wily is a very useful editor in daily use here, so
having it missing from future releases will be painful.
--
MJR
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:54:44 +0100
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ---
> > - developers-reference.sgml.old Tue Feb 19 23:43:24 2002
> > +++ developers-reference.sgml Tue Feb 19 23:43:01 2002
>
> G
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 04:24:48PM -0800, Martin Quinson wrote:
> Just curiousity: is it a RC bug to declare a program i386 only when nothing
> really justify it (beside a long list of upstream portability bugs) ?
I guess there are cases where the best solution is just to cut down the
Architecture
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 11:44:56PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > fwiw, it's available at http://cvs.debian.org/mia/README?cvsroot=qa
> > (Although I still think the procedure should be to mail -qa and someone
> > there doing MIA stuff takes care of the rest.)
> what do you think about thi
11 matches
Mail list logo
