On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:42:41PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> libmwdrivers.before it's used, and without someone giving me a log of
> the actual failure (which will require dropping that silly redirection
> from debian/rules), you're just guessing.
Sent by private mail.
--
"You grabbe
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It was easily reproduced - there's no libmwdrivers.a for powerpc and the
> microwindows build tries to use that before it's built.
No, no, a thousand times no. microwindows does try to build
libmwdrivers.before it's used, and without someone giving m
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 18:47, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not
> > responsible for checking build status and logs [...]
>
> Which is kind of silly, given how easy it is to go to
> http://buildd.
Le Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr écrivait:
> I'm really glad that this is possible now. However, I wonder if this
> should really be hosted at packages.qa.d.o. Why cannot it be
> integrated with the normal [EMAIL PROTECTED] bot? After all, this is a
> bugs issue. I'm a
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:42:18AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi,
hi
> I'd appreciate if someone could adjust the patch in #115625 to work with our
> version of reformime in the stable maildrop package.
i'v been lurking at the src and it seems to me that the DoS is not
effective against reform
* Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020106 13:04]:
> > - you mail mia-@qa.debian.org
> I knew about this, but I thought only qa people should send mails
> there
Raphael has done it already so there's no need to do it again.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask
> > every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their
> > packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify
> > (opt-in) maintainers about such problems). The port maintainers
>
> Such as the pack
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask
> every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their
> packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify
> (opt-in) maintainers about
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 11:55:13AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:21:45AM +, Adam Olsen ?crivait:
> > * It can be used by users simply to watch packages they're interested
> > in.
>
> I'm not sure that it's really fun to watch. However, yes of course if
> they wish.
I concur with Dan here - part because it's really his job, part because
I've had it with filing bug reports from m68k buildds myself. But there's
always two sides to that issue, so:
> > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask
> > every maintainer to do a few extra steps
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:47:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > (I rarely do these
> > > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and
> > > logs).
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 18:47, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not
> responsible for checking build status and logs [...]
Which is kind of silly, given how easy it is to go to
http://buildd.debian.org and look up build logs for a package.
Le Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:30:36AM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva écrivait:
> a friend told me that the gnu-smalltalk was too old on unstable,
> I went to check this out and found out that its maintainer is
> MIA since Oct 2000 and decided to do some QA on the package...
>
> I have an NMU ready, wic
* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020105 15:16]:
> the QA group will soon provide a new service[1]. The ability to
> subscribe to packages
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm really glad that this is possible now. However, I wonder if this
should really be hosted at packages.qa.d.o. Why cannot it be
Le Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:21:45AM +, Adam Olsen écrivait:
> * It can be used by users simply to watch packages they're interested
> in.
I'm not sure that it's really fun to watch. However, yes of course if
they wish. But we shouldn't explicitely advertise it to our users, they
may learn it th
> > I've rescheduled the 0.88pre11-4 build hoping the build dependencies
> > install now. But that doesn't relate to #121459 at all.
>
> As far as I can tell, it doesn't work:
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=microwindows&ver=0.88pre11-4&arch=powerpc&stamp=1010178840&file=log&as=raw
The
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:32:30 +0100
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Easy :
> - you get some information about the maintainer (you see if he has many
> outstanding bugs, how old the bugs are, you check the last seen
> field on db.debian.org (you need to authenticate to get the info))
> microwindows is not building on powerpc, but I don't know why. The
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/microwindows-0.88pre11/build/fb/microwin/src'
make[2]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/microwindows-0.88pre11/build/fb/microwin/src/apps'
make[3]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/mi
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:18:59PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> What do you mean by "the build report"? Do you mean bug report
> 121459?
The bug, sorry.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
pgpO8RwoFItnm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:47:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (I rarely do these
> > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and
> > logs).
>
> This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not
> responsible
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask
> every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their
> packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify
> (opt-in) maintainers about such problems).
R
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's why (only the last of four identical errors). According to the
> package listing page at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages there's no
> libmwdrivers.a in any of the PowerPC packages, any distribution. On ix86
> the file is in libmicrowindow
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's why (only the last of four identical errors). According to the
> package listing page at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages there's no
> libmwdrivers.a in any of the PowerPC packages, any distribution. On ix86
> the file is in libmicrowindow
Hello list!
[please CC me, I tried to subscribe but didn't get a confirm
mail yet]
a friend told me that the gnu-smalltalk was too old on unstable,
I went to check this out and found out that its maintainer is
MIA since Oct 2000 and decided to do some QA on the package...
I have an NMU ready, wi
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 03:16:57PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello everybody,
[snippage]
>
> * Anything else ? Please tell me ... :)
* It can be used by users simply to watch packages they're interested
in.
>
[more snippage]
>
> Now, your feedback is welcome. I also accept volunteers who
Hello everybody,
the QA group will soon provide a new service[1]. The ability to subscribe
to packages : when you're subscribed to a package you get all
the BTS mails that the maintainer is getting.
How does it work ?
You can (un)subscribe to a package by sending a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The
26 matches
Mail list logo
