Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > libs/microwindows_0.88pre11-4: Dep-Wait by schmitz-pb [optional:uncompiled] > > Dependencies: freetype2-dev (>= 1.3.1-1), freetype2 (= 1.3.1-1) > > That may be a repercussion of using an outdated version of apt on my > autobuilder - I can retry that build. It's obvious after attempting to in

help needed with a reformime bug

2002-01-05 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, I'd appreciate if someone could adjust the patch in #115625 to work with our version of reformime in the stable maildrop package. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Please don't. I just tried to build it and got exactly the same error > > > > as in the build report. > > > > > What version of apt do you have installed? > > > > 0.5.4. Why? > > Because I suspected a problem with apt at the bottom of thes

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 07:10:58PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > I would like to close bug 121459, and rely on powerpc to attempt a > > build by the normal process and report a new bug against the current > > Please don't. I just tried to buil

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've rescheduled the 0.88pre11-4 build hoping the build dependencies > install now. But that doesn't relate to #121459 at all. Oh yes, and Michael: direct mail to you still bounces with your mail server saying "We don't accept mail from spammers".

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Please note that I haven't filed any bug of that sort (I rarely do these > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and logs). FYI: It's worth telling to maintainers - a huge proportion won't pay any attention unl

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gtranscript 0.2.0-3

2002-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 117589 + fixed Bug#117589: ITA: gtranscript -- GNOME SQL database client Tags added: fixed > tag 68528 + fixed Bug#68528: gtranscript: not including postgres plugin Tags added: fixed > tag 75997 + fixed Bug#75997: gtranscript should suggest a plug

[판촉물,카렌다] debian-qa님 안녕하십니까?

2002-01-05 Thread 기프트나라
Title: 제목없음 안녕하세요.기프트나라입니다 허락없이 글을 올리게 되어 죄송 합니다. 제품 제조사와의 직거래 유통을 통하여 저렴한 단가로 다양한 제품을 판매하고자 하오니 기타 궁금하신 점을 문의하여 주시면 최선을 다하여 답해드리겠습니다. 용도: 선물용품/기념품/판촉용품/개업용품/행사용품/ 광고용품/생활용품/가정용품/사무용품/***카렌다*** 위생용품/차량용품등 전화:055-277-9919 팩스:055-277-9916 H.P:011-597-9514 http://ww

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've rescheduled the 0.88pre11-4 build hoping the build dependencies > install now. But that doesn't relate to #121459 at all. As far as I can tell, it doesn't work: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=microwindows&ver=0.88pre11-4&arch=powerpc&st

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (I rarely do these > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and > logs). This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not responsible for checking build status and logs; the port maintainer (whoever is responsible for m