On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 09:28:14PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > How old an ITA should I poke at? One year? Six months? Two weeks?
> >
> > My intuition says about a month. Looking at the modtime of the .log file
> > on master is probably
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How old an ITA should I poke at? One year? Six months? Two weeks?
>
> My intuition says about a month. Looking at the modtime of the .log file
> on master is probably easier than looking at the misleading age of the
> bug.
Say more. Why is the l
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 09:57:00AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> There are a number of very old ITAs on the wnpp list. Seems to me
> that we should contact the developers who posted the ITAs, and if they
> don't reconfirm, convert them to Os.
>
> I'm happy to do the work.
Yes!
> However,
I have uploaded new versions of the following orphaned packages with
maintainer field set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
zope-emarket
zope-guf
zope-loginmanager
zope-pythonmethod
zope-renderable
zope-zcvsmixin
zope-zieve
zope-znavigator
zope-zpatterns
zope-zwiki
Thomas
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 09:50:53AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Please remove the following source packages plus their binaries from
> > unstable: tkmasqdialer gmasqdialer masqdialer mclient
> >
> > The packages have been orphaned for more than 1.5 months. The previous
> > maintainer wr
There are a number of very old ITAs on the wnpp list. Seems to me
that we should contact the developers who posted the ITAs, and if they
don't reconfirm, convert them to Os.
I'm happy to do the work.
However, two questions:
How old an ITA should I poke at? One year? Six months? Two weeks?
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
>
> Please remove the following source packages plus their binaries from
> unstable: tkmasqdialer gmasqdialer masqdialer mclient
>
> The packages have been orphaned for more than 1.5 months. The previous
> maintainer writes
Rune Broberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jumping directly into some New Years resolution I hope to keep, doing
> more for Debian, I would like to take over maintaining this package -
> however, I have no experience in packaging or the like, which I expect
> will take me at least a few days to le
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:35:35PM +0100, Rune Broberg wrote:
> Apparently I made a minor error while editing my mail, and forgot a
> block of text: Seemingly, there is no source package for pgpgpg?
There is: try the non-US archive. If you're running unstable with
appropriate deb-src lines, 'apt-g
Package: ftp.debian.org
Please remove the following source packages plus their binaries from
unstable: tkmasqdialer gmasqdialer masqdialer mclient
The packages have been orphaned for more than 1.5 months. The previous
maintainer writes in his WNPP bugs (119083, 119084, 119082, and 119087):
| I
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Rune Broberg wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 04:02:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> >
> > The maintainer field for pgpgpg needs to be set to Debian QA, but I
> Happy New Year!
Apparently I made a minor error while editing my mail, and forgot a
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 04:02:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> The maintainer field for pgpgpg needs to be set to Debian QA, but I
> can't do it because it's currently a package that lives in the non-us
> archive. Someone suitable non-US needs to DTRT. (As described on
> http://qa.deb
12 matches
Mail list logo
