Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2001 00:42:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mpg123 is indeed 0.59r
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:52:52 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#109378: fixed in vic 1:2.8ucl1.1.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:52:52 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#104950: fixed in vic 1:2.8ucl1.1.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:53:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#113518: fixed in wemi 1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Installing:
xmmsarts_0.4-17.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xmmsarts/xmmsarts_0.4-17.diff.gz
xmmsarts_0.4-17.dsc
to pool/main/x/xmmsarts/xmmsarts_0.4-17.dsc
xmmsarts_0.4-17_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xmmsarts/xmmsarts_0.4-17_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs:
T
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
wemi_1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2_all.deb: priority is overridden from optional to
extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Installing:
wemi_1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2.diff.gz
to pool/main/w/wemi/wemi_1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2.diff.gz
wemi_1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2.dsc
to pool/main/w/wemi/wemi_1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2.dsc
wemi_1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2_all.deb
to pool/main/w/wemi/wemi_1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2_al
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > I'm happy to resurrect yodl, fix the rest of its bugs, and maintain
> > it until such time as nothing else in Debian build-depends on it.
> > (I'm the groff maintainer, so another documentation language
> > shoul
Installing:
rrlogind_2.35-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/rrlogind/rrlogind_2.35-7.diff.gz
rrlogind_2.35-7.dsc
to pool/main/r/rrlogind/rrlogind_2.35-7.dsc
rrlogind_2.35-7_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rrlogind/rrlogind_2.35-7_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs:
T
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:23:47 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#120501: fixed in kyahoo 0.7.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:20:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#119813: fixed in kdegraphics 4:2.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:09:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#116438: fixed in faqomatic 2.711-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:10:00 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#120447: fixed in faqomatic 2.711-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Installing:
kyahoo_0.7.0-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/k/kyahoo/kyahoo_0.7.0-6.diff.gz
kyahoo_0.7.0-6.dsc
to pool/main/k/kyahoo/kyahoo_0.7.0-6.dsc
kyahoo_0.7.0-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kyahoo/kyahoo_0.7.0-6_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 120501
Thank
Installing:
ark_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdeutils/ark_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kab_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kab_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
karm_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdeutils/karm_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kcalc_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kcalc_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kcharsel
Installing:
kandy_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kdepim-dev_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-dev_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kdepim-libs_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-libs_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kdepim_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_
Installing:
kdenetwork_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/k/kdenetwork/kdenetwork_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
kdenetwork_2.2.2-1.dsc
to pool/main/k/kdenetwork/kdenetwork_2.2.2-1.dsc
kdenetwork_2.2.2.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kdenetwork/kdenetwork_2.2.2.orig.tar.gz
kdict_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kden
Installing:
kcoloredit_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdegraphics/kcoloredit_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kdegraphics_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/k/kdegraphics/kdegraphics_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
kdegraphics_2.2.2-1.dsc
to pool/main/k/kdegraphics/kdegraphics_2.2.2-1.dsc
kdegraphics_2.2.2.orig.tar.gz
to pool
Installing:
dcopperl_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdebindings/dcopperl_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
dcoppython_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdebindings/dcoppython_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kdebindings_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/k/kdebindings/kdebindings_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
kdebindings_2.2.2-1.dsc
to pool/m
Installing:
kcmlinuz_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdeadmin/kcmlinuz_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kcron_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdeadmin/kcron_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kdeadmin_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/k/kdeadmin/kdeadmin_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
kdeadmin_2.2.2-1.dsc
to pool/main/k/kdeadmin/kdeadmin_2.2.
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
aktion_2.2.2-1_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong p
Installing:
aktion_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/contrib/a/aktion/aktion_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
aktion_2.2.2-1.dsc
to pool/contrib/a/aktion/aktion_2.2.2-1.dsc
aktion_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/contrib/a/aktion/aktion_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
aktion_2.2.2.orig.tar.gz
to pool/contrib/a/aktion/aktion_2.2.2.orig.tar
Installing:
kmozilla_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/non-US/main/k/kmozilla/kmozilla_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
kmozilla_2.2.2-1.dsc
to pool/non-US/main/k/kmozilla/kmozilla_2.2.2-1.dsc
kmozilla_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/non-US/main/k/kmozilla/kmozilla_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kmozilla_2.2.2.orig.tar.gz
to pool/non-US
Installing:
kdessh_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/non-US/main/k/kdessh/kdessh_2.2.2-1.diff.gz
kdessh_2.2.2-1.dsc
to pool/non-US/main/k/kdessh/kdessh_2.2.2-1.dsc
kdessh_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/non-US/main/k/kdessh/kdessh_2.2.2-1_i386.deb
kdessh_2.2.2.orig.tar.gz
to pool/non-US/main/k/kdessh/kdess
wemi_1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
wemi_1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2.dsc
wemi_1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2.diff.gz
wemi_1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
> Steve Kowalik had fixed the release-critical issues with yodl itself
> before the package was removed. I'm happy to resurrect yodl, fix the
> rest of its bugs, and maintain it until such time as nothing else in
> Debian build-depends on it. (I'm the groff maintainer, so another
> documentation la
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity #111945 normal
Bug#111945: kscd: kscd crashes when changing the cdrom device
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Hi,
While I appreciate the reasons for removing yodl, there are still five
packages in the Debian archive that rely on it in order to build
(ecamegapedal, ecawave, xwatch, zsh, zsh-beta). Because of this, I think
its removal was premature.
Steve Kowalik had fixed the release-critical issues with
Hi,
I'd like to hear your opinion on the following proposal:
Currently QA works the way that people find something to do themselves and
everyone works for himself at the tasks he sees. I propose to change this
to define tasks of QA work with usually 2-3 people responsible for each
area. These pe
광고 메일
입니다.
안녕하십니까 ! www.woojeon.net
운영자입니다. 허락없이 메일을 드려 대단히 죄송합니다.
정중히 양해를 부탁드립니다. 원하지 않는 메일이라면
아래의 "수신거부" 버튼을 눌러 주시면 다시는
귀하께 가지 않도록 확실하게 처리 하겠습니다.
30 matches
Mail list logo