Bug#31214: marked as done (saytime says only "blurp")

Your message dated 17 Nov 2001 21:36:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug

Re: WNPP bug overview

On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 05:32:22PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > My script can also automatically rename ITA's to O's and ITP's to RFP's. > Do you like this idea? Please make sure that you cc the person who submitted the ITA/ITP (who isn't always the bug submitter) if you do this. For instance, my

Bug#90690: marked as done (saydate gets uptime wrong)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2001 15:06:59 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#90690: fixed in saydate 0.3.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#119752: marked as done (saydate: bashisms in supposedly /bin/sh script)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2001 15:06:59 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#119752: fixed in saydate 0.3.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

xpuzzles_5.5.4.1-1_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: xmpuzzles_5.5.4.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xpuzzles/xmpuzzles_5.5.4.1-1_i386.deb xpuzzles_5.5.4.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/x/xpuzzles/xpuzzles_5.5.4.1.orig.tar.gz xpuzzles_5.5.4.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xpuzzles/xpuzzles_5.5.4.1-1.diff.gz xpuzzles_5.5.4.1-1_i386.deb to pool/

saydate_0.3.0-5_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: saydate_0.3.0-5.dsc to pool/main/s/saydate/saydate_0.3.0-5.dsc saydate_0.3.0-5_all.deb to pool/main/s/saydate/saydate_0.3.0-5_all.deb saydate_0.3.0-5.diff.gz to pool/main/s/saydate/saydate_0.3.0-5.diff.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 119752 90

Re: WNPP bug overview

On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 05:32:22PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > The following packages are up for removal from the archive[1]: > - O: yc-el, 400 days, main, 0 RC bugs > - O: python-gendoc, 397 days, main, 0 RC bugs IMO this would be more readable if it sorted by RC bugs, then by age. > The fol

Re: WNPP bug overview

Hi Martin! You wrote: > > I've written a script which generates overviews of the wnpp BTS entry. > Where are the sources? ~bas/wbos on master. > > The following errors were encountered: > > The error checking doesn't work properly. > > > - 92447: ITA'ed package "siag" does not exist in arch

Re: WNPP bug overview

Hi Adrian! You wrote: > There are two serious bugs in your script: > 1. Your script wants to retitle an RFA that was retitled to ITA to O >instead of RFA. > 2. Your script does only look at the "xyz days old" age at the bug but not >at the day of the last retitle. Consider e.g. a 98 days

Processed: reassign

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign #116046 kde-i18n-ptbr Bug#116046: kdm ins't seems not be showing internationalized messages Bug reassigned from package `kdm' to `kde-i18n-ptbr'. > reassign #117300 kdelibs3-crypto Bug#117300: https/ssl support broken in KDE 2.2.1 testing/wood

Re: WNPP bug overview

* Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 17:32]: > I've written a script which generates overviews of the wnpp BTS entry. Where are the sources? > The following errors were encountered: The error checking doesn't work properly. > - 92447: ITA'ed package &q

Re: WNPP bug overview

On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi guys! Hi Bas! > I've written a script which generates overviews of the wnpp BTS entry. > An example of a report in included below. These reports should enable >... There are two serious bugs in your script: 1. Your script wants to retitle an RFA

WNPP bug overview

Hi guys! I've written a script which generates overviews of the wnpp BTS entry. An example of a report in included below. These reports should enable us to clean out en keep healthy the wnpp bug entry. If no one object, I am going to send weekly reports to debian-devel. Before starting those wee

Re: Remove nextaw, xaw-wrappers and ssh2 from unstable?

retitle 105531 Please remove xaw-wrappers from unstable reassign 105531 ftp.debian.org retitle 105532 Please remove nextaw from unstable reassign 105532 ftp.debian.org thanks On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Hi, > > I'd suggest to remove the following orphaned packages from unstable: >

Bug#119813: kdegraphics_4:2.2.1.0-2.1 fails to autobuild on m68k

On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:33:54AM -0800, Rick Younie wrote: > Package: kdegraphics > Version: 4:2.2.1.0-2.1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > | Automatic build of kdegraphics_4:2.2.1.0-2.1 on bruno by sbuild/m68k 1.159 > | Build started at 2005-1624 > | > *