Your message dated Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:56:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#118498: fixed in frad 0.20-4.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Installing:
frad_0.20-4.2_ia64.deb
to pool/main/f/frad/frad_0.20-4.2_ia64.deb
frad_0.20-4.2.diff.gz
to pool/main/f/frad/frad_0.20-4.2.diff.gz
frad_0.20-4.2.dsc
to pool/main/f/frad/frad_0.20-4.2.dsc
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 118498
Thank you for your
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:14:05PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> This one is open book, use whatever resources you want to find an
> answer, but provide sources for any quotation (Colin, you still owe me
> that PCR source).
I don't know of a source for the composite Provides/Conflicts/Rep
3.0.17 source and i386 binary have been uploaded. Haven't had a
chance to even test that so if it's broken we'll need to
turn-around 3.0.18 very quickly.
I've put up a version for testing at
http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-i386/3.0.17-2001-11-13/>.
Please let us know
Hi fellas,
This one is open book, use whatever resources you want to find an
answer, but provide sources for any quotation (Collin, you still owe me
that PCR source).
A package has or is the source of interoperability problems. What
should the bug severity be set to? Consider other Linux d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 64980 RFP: dna-mode -- An Emacs mode for editing DNA sequences
Bug#64980: biomode: Another Emacs mode?
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 64980 wnpp
Bug#64980: RFP: dna-mode -- An Emacs mode for editing DNA sequences
Bug reassigned from package `bio
Your message dated Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:31:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #93696,
regarding include command's search path is broken
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Mark Probst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Heinz Deinhart
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notforwarded 93696
Bug#93696: include command's search path is broken
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:09:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #93696,
regarding include command's search path is broken
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system admi
9 matches
Mail list logo