Re: RC bugs in packages maintained by this list

On 21/10/01, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Colin Watson writes: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > > > I can clean out some of the ssh2 stuff, but somebody who actually knows > > > about ssh should have a look at the ones that aren't just build > > > failures. > > O

Almanaque Informes ?teis

Title: Almanaque Informes Úteis Distribuição Gratuita  

Almanaque Informes ?teis

Title: Almanaque Informes Úteis Distribuição Gratuita  

Bug#116587: ITA: noatun

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: noatun Severity: normal I actively hack on noatun. I want to take over this package to make sure it's up to date. I will also work on the kde3 version of noatun code. Thanks, - -- Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Comp. Sci. Dept., B

Re: RFC: debian-qa-packages

On 21/10/01, Colin Watson wrote: > If there's consensus here then I'll request a new mailing list as > follows: [...] > Comments? Make it so. :-) Christian -- Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org) 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853 pgpjyLq4Tr1D2.pgp

Re: RFC: debian-qa-packages

* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20011021 08:48]: > We now have 32 packages maintained by debian-qa and 223 packages > maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that these figures are for binary packages, not source packages. It's about 21 + 96 by source packages (no

Bug#110567: marked as done (ssh2: missing Build-Depends, namely xbase-clients)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2001 20:52:27 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#110567: fixed in ssh2 2.0.13-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#111633: marked as done (ssh2_2.0.13-5.2(unstable): build failure (possibly easy fix))

Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2001 20:52:27 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#111633: fixed in ssh2 2.0.13-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#60498: marked as done (new SSH2 broke SSH1 (sshd2 reports v2.0 not 1.99))

Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2001 20:52:27 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#60498: fixed in ssh2 2.0.13-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

ssh2_2.0.13-6_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: ssh2_2.0.13-6.diff.gz to pool/non-US/non-free/s/ssh2/ssh2_2.0.13-6.diff.gz ssh2_2.0.13-6.dsc to pool/non-US/non-free/s/ssh2/ssh2_2.0.13-6.dsc ssh2_2.0.13-6_i386.deb to pool/non-US/non-free/s/ssh2/ssh2_2.0.13-6_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing b

ssh2 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): ssh2_2.0.13-6_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong pl

Re: RC bugs in packages maintained by this list

Colin Watson writes: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > > I can clean out some of the ssh2 stuff, but somebody who actually knows > > about ssh should have a look at the ones that aren't just build > > failures. > > OK, acrimony aside, I've downgraded one of ss

O: dotfile-doc -- Dotfile Generator modules programmer documentation.

Package: wnpp Severity: normal dotfile-doc is orphaned, but it seems nobody filed a bug about it in WNPP. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- retitle this bug from 'O:' to 'ITA:', fix the outstanding bugs and upload a new version with your name in the Maintainer: field and a

Re: RFC: debian-qa-packages

Hi, On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Colin Watson wrote: > If there's consensus here then I'll request a new mailing list as > follows: > > 1. Name > debian-qa-packages > Comments? Go for it! yours, peter -- PGP sign

RFC: debian-qa-packages

One of the points that came up in my argument with Christian was that it'd be nice if we could split discussions of orphaned package maintenance off to a separate list. This was the original rationale for changing the orphaned Maintainer: field to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)

Processed: Need more information

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 114590 mpg123: binary is 0.59q, not 0.59r (?) Bug#114590: Bug report mpg123 SID Changed Bug title. > tags 114590 moreinfo Bug#114590: mpg123: binary is 0.59q, not 0.59r (?) Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contac

Bug#112645: marked as done (installing xlibs tries to overwrite /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2001 13:41:48 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#112645: installing xlibs tries to overwrite /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Re: RC bugs in packages maintained by this list

On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > I can clean out some of the ssh2 stuff, but somebody who actually knows > about ssh should have a look at the ones that aren't just build > failures. OK, acrimony aside, I've downgraded one of ssh2's RC bugs and fixed the remaining th

Processed: downgrading further

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 59031 normal Bug#59031: ssh2: ssh2_2.0.13-5 sshd cannot create .Xauthority Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#59031: downgrading

severity 59031 normal thanks i don't use ssh2 any more (use openssh now) and this behavior vanished as mysteriously as it appeared. downgrading to normal, feel free to close it.