I'm a teacher of the computer study and I take care of the school
laboratory in the Special Secondery School.
/The real name of my school is - Szkoła Zawodowa Specjalna nr 4 w Nowym
Sšczu/.
My pupils are different than the healthy children so I have to do
everything what is the best for them.
Becau
Package: psptools
Version: 1.2.2-3
Hello,
In certain circumstances, psplpr can remove a postscript line and
duplicate another one.
I use debian 2.2r3 with security updates on i386.
This bug is present in both version 1.2.2-3 and 1.2.2-5.
Here is how to reproduce the bug :
zcat /usr/doc/gs-aladd
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:15:36PM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>
> >> 1) Please cite the section and name of standard you are referring to
> >
> >It is present in the HTML 4.01 specification[1], among others.
>
> MHonArc's HTML output does not claim to be 4.01 compliant;
> note the DTD below w
Package: linuxconf
Version: 1.26r1-1
Severity: serious
The linuxconf package failed to autobuild on ia64. The last few
lines of output up to where the build fails follow:
| dh_installchangelogs -plinuxconf
| dh_strip -a
| strip: Warning: Output file cannot represent architecture UNKNOWN!
| strip
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 6345 dome: no man pages for dome(1) and dxftopov(1)
Bug#6345: deb-check 0.2 report on
/var/pub/debian/bo/binary-i386/math/dome_4.60-1.deb
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Jeff Breidenbach writes:
> MHonArc's HTML output does not claim to be 4.01 compliant; note the
> DTD below which I think is indicative of HTML 3.2.
>
>
I believe this is a red herring, LINK has been mentioned in HTML specs
since at least HTML 2.0.
ttfn/rjk
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:26:23AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 18/10/01, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:26:06PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > On 18/10/01, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > Are you willing to maintain it,
>
> > > No, since I'm currently happy with the numbe
Hi Anthony!
You wrote:
> It might be helpful if there was a "will be removed from the distro in a
> week if not adopted" list as part of wnpp. Some possible rules for sticking
> packages in there could be:
>
> * non-free and orphaned for more than 60 days
> * orphaned for more than 3
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:26:23AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > Is that the new way of threading people who speak up against a removal
> > > request for a package?
> > Show me the threat.
> Pardon, telling someone who speaks up against a removal for either
> maintainig the package or at "leas
[Okay, seems like discussions are also not appreciated on this list.
It's sad to see that this list is moving into the same direction of
debian-devel. But since this seems to happen, I'm also now stopping to
post anything here anymore and even reconsider my position about QA.]
On 18/10/01, Colin W
>> 1) Please cite the section and name of standard you are referring to
>
>It is present in the HTML 4.01 specification[1], among others.
MHonArc's HTML output does not claim to be 4.01 compliant;
note the DTD below which I think is indicative of HTML 3.2.
>> 2) Almost any aspect of index and
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> * #89881: swi-prolog: bus error during build on sparc
>Package: swi-prolog; Severity: serious; Reported by: Ben Collins
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 214 days old.
> * #99032: can't build on arm
>Package: swi-
12 matches
Mail list logo
