Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 21:42:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line POSE has replaced xcopilot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 21:42:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line POSE has replaced xcopilot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 21:42:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line POSE has replaced xcopilot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 21:42:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line POSE has replaced xcopilot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 18472
Bug#18472: xcopilot: Documentation updates
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reopen 34321
Bug#34321: Please improve documentation about serial ports
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reopen 21966
Bug#21966: xcopilot dies using
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:56:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs close after package removal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:56:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs close after package removal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:56:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs close after package removal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:56:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs close after package removal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:56:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs close after package removal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 34321 Please improve documentation about serial ports
Bug#34321: xcopilot: serial port redirected to console?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 34321 wishlist
Bug#34321: Please improve documentation about serial ports
Severity set to `wishlist'.
>
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 23:14:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xcopilot removed from Debian, use pose
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 23:14:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xcopilot removed from Debian, use pose
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi Ray,
You submitted a patch for xcopilot in #37081. xcopilot has been
removed from Debian in favour of pose. Do you know if pose has the
functionality you wanted? If yes, can I close this bug? If no, can
you close this bug and file a wishlist bug against pose?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PR
xcopliot was removed from Debian because it's no longer developed and
supserseded by pose. Can someone please test if the following bugs
are present in pose. If not, close the bug and tell the submitter to
use pose. If yes, reassign to pose.
18472: xcopilot: Documentation updates
21966: xcopil
Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of phplib_7.2d-1.dsc.
Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of phplib_7.2d-1.diff.gz.
Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of phplib_7.2d-1_all.deb.
Rejected: can not overwrite existing copy of 'phplib_7.2d-1
Installing:
ilu-doc_2.0.0.91-3_all.deb
to pool/contrib/i/ilu/ilu-doc_2.0.0.91-3_all.deb
ilu-examples_2.0.0.91-3_all.deb
to pool/contrib/i/ilu/ilu-examples_2.0.0.91-3_all.deb
ilu-dev_2.0.0.91-3_ia64.deb
to pool/contrib/i/ilu/ilu-dev_2.0.0.91-3_ia64.deb
ilu-base_2.0.0.91-3_ia64.deb
to pool/c
Installing:
kde-i18n-et_2.2.1-3_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kde-i18n/kde-i18n-et_2.2.1-3_all.deb
kde-i18n-pt_2.2.1-3_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kde-i18n/kde-i18n-pt_2.2.1-3_all.deb
kde-i18n-he_2.2.1-3_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kde-i18n/kde-i18n-he_2.2.1-3_all.deb
kde-i18n-eo_2.2.1-3_all.deb
to pool/ma
Installing:
lvs_0.9.7-2.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lvs/lvs_0.9.7-2.tar.gz
lvs_0.9.7-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/lvs/lvs_0.9.7-2_i386.deb
lvs_0.9.7-2.dsc
to pool/main/l/lvs/lvs_0.9.7-2.dsc
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 102791 71791
Thank you for your contributi
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2001 15:01:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#109891: fixed in ilu 2.0.0.91-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2001 15:01:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#96654: fixed in ilu 2.0.0.91-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
This bug will be closed, see below:
- Forwarded message from Norbert Nemec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Norbert Nemec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cooledit: The "-i" option
To: David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-UIDL: 1001865330.22158.limousin.fr.clara.net
Sorry, same as before: that'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 70631 unreproducible
Bug#70631: cooledit: The "-i" option does not seem to work
Tags added: unreproducible
> close 70631
Bug#70631: cooledit: The "-i" option does not seem to work
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Norbert Nemec <[EMAIL
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 06:37:59AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is merely an automated notification mail from the ddts 'Debian
> Description Translation Server'.
Can these please be turned off by maintainer (debian-qa@lists.debian.org
or [EMAIL PROTECTED]), not by package? New packages b
Hello!
This is merely an automated notification mail from the ddts 'Debian Description
Translation Server'.
A translator recently uploaded a new version of the description of this
package. The descriptions are included below.
For more information about this mail and the ddts, please visit this p
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2001 00:05:57 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 2.5.0 ETA?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jeff, I did not notice the above issue until after I sent you a patched
> resource file using $TSLICE$.
>
> To summarize the note above: Some message pages may not get properly
> updated to reflect changes in $TSLICE$ listing. This can occur if
> the mess
27 matches
Mail list logo
