> "Sean" == Sean Perry writes:
Sean> Married life has taken more time than I ever expected.
Yeah, it'll do that to you; wait till you've got kids as well :)
--
Stephen
"A duck!"
Regarding to the bugs #97691 and #96234 and the inactivity of its
maintainer (Richard Krekel, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and this unsatisfying
situations (cint "killed" today an m68k autobuilder) we moved cint to
not-for-us section to avoid further problems.
For people who are interested in the whole logf
On 01-07-24 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:24:07AM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:00:36AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > Who has the authority to remove a package in this state, and forestall
> > > angry complaints should the maintainer com
Colin Watson proclaimed:
>
> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This has been going on for quite a while. Unless someone can reach thaths,
> >he should be considered MIA and his packages should be orphaned. :/
>
> Hi Sudhakar,
>
> Is this a valid e-mail address for you? Do you
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>This has been going on for quite a while. Unless someone can reach thaths,
>he should be considered MIA and his packages should be orphaned. :/
Hi Sudhakar,
Is this a valid e-mail address for you? Do you need NMUs to change the
maintainer address on
Hi,
This has been going on for quite a while. Unless someone can reach thaths,
he should be considered MIA and his packages should be orphaned. :/
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:50:40 +0200
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001
Le Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:55:13AM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait:
> > The QA committee was designed to play such a role. Sorry.
>
> The committee may have been designed that way, but it never had any
> more authority to act than any maintainer already has. (IOW, a QA
Yes, that's true, but many ma
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:59:57PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:24:07AM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:00:36AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > Who has the authority to remove a package in this state, and forestall
> > > angry compla
Le Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 04:49:05AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode écrivait:
> Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >infocom, int-fiction, jlex, libggidemos, propsel, rocks-n-diamonds,
>xserver-ggi: this maintainer looks like completely MIA. I see tbm has
>noticed already :>
>
> "infocom" w
Le Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:24:07AM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:00:36AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > Who has the authority to remove a package in this state, and forestall
> > angry complaints should the maintainer come back some years in the
> > future? Well
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:00:36AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Who has the authority to remove a package in this state, and forestall
> angry complaints should the maintainer come back some years in the
> future? Well, the QA committee clearly does.
Not really. The QA committee was never g
Raphael Herzog said:
>Le Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:02:18PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr écrivait:
>> Basically, I tried to come up with what a QA committee could actually
>> do. And, well, I couldn't find anything. So I suggest to officially
>> close the committee down. However, perhaps not coming up
Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>infocom, int-fiction, jlex, libggidemos, propsel, rocks-n-diamonds,
xserver-ggi: this maintainer looks like completely MIA. I see tbm has
noticed already :>
"infocom" was abandoned upstream several years ago. The "Infocom Task
Force", who wrote it,
Hi
I successfully installed debian 2.2r3 on my PC, but I'm having trouble
configuring my Genius GF100TXRIII network card. The bundled disk says
I have to use the rtl8139 kernel module
I have RedHat installed on another partition on the same PC, and it
works (using 8139too module, since it's redhat
14 matches
Mail list logo
