Re: Libraries to move to oldlibs

2001-07-12 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 02:31:16AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >libdb2 (1 bug) - lots of packages do not work with libdb3 (exim), and there > >are problems in with data files in the transition, leave the libdb2 its > >current place, or move it to oldlibs t

Re: Libraries to move to oldlibs

2001-07-12 Thread Colin Watson
Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >libdb2 (1 bug) - lots of packages do not work with libdb3 (exim), and there >are problems in with data files in the transition, leave the libdb2 its >current place, or move it to oldlibs to show that it is deprecated. Erk. I asked the maintainer a while ago

Re: Libraries to move to oldlibs

2001-07-12 Thread Edward Betts
Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > libxaw6 (0 bugs) - rosegarden (6 bugs) Just compiled rosegarden against libxaw7, seems to work fine, I have not tried executing it. > plib1 (0 bugs) - flightgear (10 bugs) Found that flightgear depends on simgear-dev, which depends on plib1-dev, which de

Libraries to move to oldlibs

2001-07-12 Thread Edward Betts
What follows is a list of libraries that are included in Debian, outside the oldlibs section. All of the libraries listed have a newer version available. My question, is what should be done with these libraries? * Old libraries that lots of programs still use: libasound1 (1 bug)- move it to oldlib

Bug#102025: downgrading this bug

2001-07-12 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > asclock-gtk is abandonware already. The upstream website is gone, the > author is completely MIA, etc. In short, there is no upstream URL. So > even if we need one in the copyright file, it's not posible to provide > one, so this bug shouldn't be

Re: pspell and aspell (was Re: searching for Sudhakar Chandrasekharan)

2001-07-12 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:39:29PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:18:07PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > aspell is a problem, i'm not able to compile it anymore and i > > don't understand why. i would be very happy if more talented > > people could work on it. i thin