I hate to answer myself but... I have just committed to the incoming queue a
new
version of the vrwave package (0.9-10) which fixes most of the worst bugs. I
would
like, in anycase, that someone took some time to upgrade it to version 2.0 and
move it
into to "main". One of the reasons I have d
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:33:48PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Hello,
> A quick look over the FHS list:
(...)
>
> vrwave: Javi?
The problem is, the problems are quite easy to fix, but I no
longer have a Java environment in which to compile the package. I *really*
wanted to fix vrwave bu
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:33:48PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> onshore-timesheet-el: aph?
aph mailed me and said his only priority are bf's now. I guess we don't
want to distract him from that :)
He said he'd be willing to give CVS access to people who want to fix
this package. It has a nice li
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010706 09:06]:
> >libstdc++2.8: maintained by Galen Hazelwood, is he MIA (I can't
> >remember).
>
> tbm filed a bug to remove this, I think?
yeah, it's gone already.
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2001 14:58:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#94573: fixed in i2c 2.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2001 14:58:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#96189: fixed in i2c 2.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2001 14:58:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#94573: fixed in i2c 2.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2001 14:58:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#94792: fixed in i2c 2.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:18:07PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> aspell is a problem, i'm not able to compile it anymore and i
> don't understand why. i would be very happy if more talented
> people could work on it. i think it is victim of #99463, but
> i'm not able to do a workaround.
One wo
Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> A quick look over the FHS list:
> cqcam, libcqcam-dev: this package seems to be very unmaintained...
> bugs ignored for years, etc. Should be orphaned/removed.
Author just gave me permission to NMU.
--
Don't worry -- shop.
xdemineur_1.1-11.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
xdemineur_1.1-11.1.dsc
xdemineur_1.1-11.1.diff.gz
xdemineur_1.1-11.1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:58:07PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> anyway both have problem because of too old libtool stuff, i'm trying to
> solve this too. i'll post a mail to inform about the status.
>
pspell seems to be ok, i'm waiting to see it compiled on arm.
aspell is a prob
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:33:48PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> tendra: we should warn broonie on IRC.
I'll try to find time to have another look at the package over the
weekend. Not sure how far I'll get, though.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 94801
Bug#94801: icqlib: gcc 3.0 problems, build failure on PARISC
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 94801 +patch
Unknown tag/s: +patch.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstr
reopen 94801
tags 94801 +patch
quit
The following patch is still required for icqlib to compile with gcc >= 2.96
(ia64 uses 2.96, and hppa uses 3.0). Note that WORD has always promoted to int,
but now it is flagged as an error.
lamont
--- icqlib/queue.c.save Fri Jul 6 02:14:01 2001
+++ icqlib
Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>A quick look over the FHS list:
Thanks! Replies trimmed to -qa.
>cqcam, libcqcam-dev: this package seems to be very unmaintained...
>bugs ignored for years, etc. Should be orphaned/removed.
Somebody (Edward?) was working on this.
>faqomatic: sam
16 matches
Mail list logo
