Bug#61562: alernatives error in psptools

2000-04-01 Thread bonnaud
Package: psptools Version: 1.2.2-4 Severity: normal Hi, the following alernative is made of two dangling symlinks: /usr/man/man1/pslpr.1 -> /etc/alternatives/pslpr.1 /etc/alternatives/pslpr.1 -> /usr/man/man1/npslpr.1 The psptools version in potato works well because it has gzipped manpages (*.

Re: Migration of debian-qa-private and debian-qa

2000-04-01 Thread M.C. Vernon
> Thus I propose to migrate debian-qa-private into debian-qa and > remove debian-qa-private. FWIW I agree with this. I've no idea what the qa-private people get up to though ;-) Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.deb

Re: Migration of debian-qa-private and debian-qa

2000-04-01 Thread Martin Schulze
Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > it does not make sense to have debian-qa-private as list for communication > > between qa comittee and members as an ultra-secret cabal thing. Thus > > qa-private is not private right now and everybody can sub

Re: Migration of debian-qa-private and debian-qa

2000-04-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > it does not make sense to have debian-qa-private as list for communication > between qa comittee and members as an ultra-secret cabal thing. Thus > qa-private is not private right now and everybody can subscribe there. Yes. The "pr

Migration of debian-qa-private and debian-qa

2000-04-01 Thread Martin Schulze
Howdy, it does not make sense to have debian-qa-private as list for communication between qa comittee and members as an ultra-secret cabal thing. Thus qa-private is not private right now and everybody can subscribe there. Additionally QA is nothing that needs to be done in private behind closed