Bug#60060: marked as done (dotfile-bash doesn't start)

2000-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated 25 Mar 2000 19:54:18 - with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU dotfile 1:2.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Re: hwtools going multiarch

2000-03-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 08:38:30PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > but it is not declared orphaned (could be a bug in Debian web pages). > > > > Yes, a bug in the BTS. > > No, it's a bug in the override file. Dear ftpmaster, could you remove the > "maintainer override" for the hwtools package

Processed: Fixed in NMU dotfile 1:2.4-2

2000-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 60060 fixed Bug#60060: dotfile-bash doesn't start Severity set to `fixed'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Re: hwtools going multiarch

2000-03-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 04:52:14PM +0100, Josip Rodin écrivait: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 04:09:11PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: > > but it is not declared orphaned (could be a bug in Debian web pages). > > Yes, a bug in the BTS. No, it's a bug in the override file. Dear ftpmaster, could you remo

Re: hwtools going multiarch

2000-03-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 04:09:11PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: > but it is not declared orphaned (could be a bug in Debian web pages). Yes, a bug in the BTS. > I'm willing to open the scsi stuff of hwtools to all Debian architectures [snip] > What do you think about this proposal? Feel free to d

hwtools going multiarch

2000-03-25 Thread Eric Delaunay
Hello, I sent few weeks ago a request to enhance hwtools for multiarch support (#58060). However, I received no response from Siggy Brentrup even though the BTS told me that he is the current maintainer of this package. Then I wrote him directly yesterday (got his real address, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#60694: vchkpw depends on nonexistent packages

2000-03-25 Thread Christian Kurz
On 00-03-20 Brian Kimball wrote: > Christian Kurz wrote: > > > think something like "This package intentionally depends on two packages > > > not found in the Debian distribution because they are so non-free that > > > only their sources can be distributed, not their binaries. In order to > > > m