Processed: Changed email address

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 31423 Bug#31423: automake: ctags support Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! > reopen 31423 J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#31423: automake: ctags support Bug reopened, originator set to J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <[

Bug#55434: dotfile-tcsh, missing brace, #55434

On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 12:27:15PM -0500, marvin stodolsky wrote: > > I can't reproduce your problem with dotfile-tcsh 1.4-3. > > Please e-mail me/us the output of this command on your machine: > > > > dpkg -l "tk*.*" "tcl*.*" | grep ^.i > > > > This might just be another tcl/tk 8.2 incom

Bug#55982: penguineyes: has completely crashed my box the only two times I have used it

Package: penguineyes Version: 0.9-2 Severity: critical ive only ran this package twice and both times it has crashed my box. it has completely killed my machine, i cant even change to a vt. it just so happens that i was accessing the cdrom drive both times that it crashed. hopefully this will b

Re: packages for removal from woody

On Sat, Jan 22, 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > I think we should remove some of the older orphaned packages from the > unstable archive (woody). No, not from frozen - we kept them this long, we > can keep them for this release. Richard Braakman (the release manager) told > me he agrees. > > The point

Re: What Debian-qa policy for sorting packages?

Le Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 02:13:38PM +0100, Thierry Laronde écrivait: > I have made a suggestion for this (Cf "dpkg | dselect| apt : Debian-qa > fields planned ?" thread). Without going thus far, an admin could/should check if he wants to keep packages that are not provided by the selected set of a

Re: packages for removal from woody

On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 02:50:21PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > * By Christoph Lameter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > (612 Days Orphaned) > > mserver -- Network Modem Server > > optimizer -- Assembler Code optimizer for MMX, PPro and > >

Re: What Debian-qa policy for sorting packages?

Hello, On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 02:53:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..] I have sent a bug against ftp.debian.org asking for the remove of playmidi, for all the reasons explained. > > Now a question: > > Is there a clean way (other than release notes) to > direct the user of playmidi t

RE: What Debian-qa policy for sorting packages?

Goal of Debian is to the best free distribution there is. Some place more emphasis on best and some on free, but in cases like this there is no doubt, the other package is: - more free - better (Debian) maintained - actively developed - less buggy so leaving this out will increase both freeness and