Processed: Re: Bug#52062 acknowledged by developer (sysutils: memtest 2.8.0 is available)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 52062 Bug#52062: sysutils: memtest 2.8.0 is available Bug reopened, originator not changed. > close 52602 Bug#52602: libapache-mod-perl: prerm script assumes /etc/apache/httpd.conf exists Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know w

Bug#52062: acknowledged by developer (sysutils: memtest 2.8.0 is available)

I'm afraid I don't see how a new libapache-mod-perl is going to fix a bug in sysutils. Typo in the libapache-mod-perl changelog in this upload? >* Don't assume httpd.conf is present (Closes: #52062). That's not the 52062 I filed. :( -- Aaron

Bug#52062: marked as done (sysutils: memtest 2.8.0 is available)

Your message dated 13 Jan 2000 19:57:45 - with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#52062: fixed in libapache-mod-perl 1.21-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Re: Embedded PPC 603e

On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 22:31:10 -0800, David R. Whipple wrote: > We are trying to port the Linux OS to run on a Motorola MPC603e (similar > to the MPC8xx boards) . The October 1999 issue of Linux journal has an article "Porting Linux to a Power PC Board" by He Zhu and Xiaoqiang Chen [An experime

Re: Looking for a package to adopt

On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 02:59:08PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > scour freshmeat or the net for something not in Debian > find something in Debian that has not been updated lately and update it > read the BTS, fix a bug or three on something you use or know about > mail a developer of a pa

Embedded PPC 603e

Hi all, My name is David Whipple. I am a electrical engineering student at UC, Irvine working on a Linux project (Mot PPC 603e) and am in need of a bit of help. We are trying to port the Linux OS to run on a Motorola MPC603e (similar to the MPC8xx boards) . The Debian project http://www.debia

Re: Looking for a package to adopt

On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 10:27:44PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > What?! Two *different* wnpp pages? Is there any chance of merging > them? I lost the response I got on the last one. I think the answer was that someone just needs to port the stuff on the old page to the new page. (Someone correct

Re: Looking for a package to adopt

On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 02:59:08PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > you can do a few things: > > scour freshmeat or the net for something not in Debian > find something in Debian that has not been updated lately and update it > read the BTS, fix a bug or three on something you use or know about