For the long term, it might be nice to divide tasks by difficulty. E.g.,
there could be a section for bugs that are fixed by a provided patch or
simple dependency rules, and another section for difficult debugging
work. (The intent of this being to make it easier for a beginner to sit
down and knoc
On Thu, 07 Oct 1999, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> secure-su is also uninstallable.
As far as I can see, secure-su is no longer available in potato. It
is replaced by the login package (including /bin/su) which is now
linked with PAM and this behaves like the secure-su if you activate
the line
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 07:27:38PM +0200, Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:29:34AM -0400, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> > secure-su is also uninstallable.
> >
> > Depends: login >=970502-1
> > Current: login 19990827-5
> >
> > Does anybody else think it's kind o
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:29:34AM -0400, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> secure-su is also uninstallable.
>
> Depends: login >=970502-1
> Current: login 19990827-5
>
> Does anybody else think it's kind of nutty that 19990827-5 is less
> than 970502-1?
It's not less:
asterix:~$ d
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:13:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> I'm experimenting with a script to work out whether packages are
> installable or not. I figured the world at large might be interested in
> some of the results.
>
> The following packages are not installable (ie, t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 18337
Bug#18337: lesstif-bin: Missing manpages
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
reopen 18337
thanks
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please reopen this. The bugreport mentions four missing manpages, only
> one of which has been written.
Sorry my mistake. Shame on me.
--
I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to me, to everyone,
and may each of you
7 matches
Mail list logo
