Le Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 04:57:14PM -0400, Raul Miller écrivait:
> Anyone know how to find these bugs? bugs.debian.org/9wm gives
> me a 404. Usually that means no bugs against the package..
Not it's a bug in the URL redirector written for bugs.debian.org, the
problem is that the first char is a n
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 11:15:55AM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suppose I should maintain 9wm...
>
> Does that mean you will look at these bug at least as a QA member?
Anyone know how to find these bugs? bugs.debian.org/9wm gives
me a 404. Usual
Please reopen this. The bugreport mentions four missing manpages, only
one of which has been written.
> Package: lesstif-bin
> Version: 19980216-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> LessTif lacks several manpages.
> * E: lesstif-bin: binary-without-manpage mwm
> * E: lesstif-bin: binary-without-manpage mx
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
> No, it means that if you want to edit a text file (unicode text in
> this case), then a text editor is more comfortable than "cat".
>
> If you want to use "cat" then you will only be able to use the input
> method provided by X and th
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 10:31:41AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 09:19:04PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > Like, how can I use cat to put a 2 x 2 in a file (using the unicode
> > > multiplication symbol in place of x)?
>
> On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 02:37:47PM +0200, Bart Schul
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 09:19:04PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > Like, how can I use cat to put a 2 x 2 in a file (using the unicode
> > multiplication symbol in place of x)?
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 02:37:47PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
> That is easier done using the Unicode text editor "yudit".
Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 15:03:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#34067: cthugha: numeric ids for cthugha in suid.conf
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
"J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Check out #45419 as well - lesstifg may need a "Lessdox" symlink in its doc
> directory so that internal references work.
Hmmm, there is a "Lessdox -> html" symlink but no file named html. But
the rules file tries to delete it. I think somethi
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 09:19:04PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Like, how can I use cat to put a 2 x 2 in a file (using the unicode
> multiplication symbol in place of x)?
That is easier done using the Unicode text editor "yudit".
--
The idea is that the first face shown to people is one they can
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 08:24:40PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 17:50:30 +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> > Does anybody use 9wm, 9term, and 9fonts? Can we dump them?
>
> 9term and 9fonts provide for the only UTF-8 (unicode) capable terminal
> emulation for X currently pa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 43640 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#43640: lesstif-bin: Minor inaccuracies and problems in manpage for xmbind
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
Debian QA Group
If you wish to conti
Version: 0.89.0
The manpage for xmbind(1) refers to a VirtualBindings(5x)-manpage but
this manpage is non-existing.
There is also some HTML tags, that should be converted to nroff (
-> .B)
--
I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to me, to everyone,
and may each of you fry in hell for
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 11:15:55AM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suppose I should maintain 9wm...
>
> Does that mean you will look at these bug at least as a QA member?
>
> [ Meaning it would be waste of time if I tried to look at them ]
Yes.
--
I will apply you patch and forward the bug upstream. The
VirtualBindings(5) doesn't seem to appear on www.lesstif.org, so it's
not just lost in the packaging.
--
I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to me, to everyone,
and may each of you fry in hell forever.
Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 12:59:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line lesstif-bin manpages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 12:45:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#27778: lesstif bug release critical?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 12:37:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#11153: Bug in dpkg-shlibdeps!!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Raul Miller writes:
> > I use 9wm (when I'm not using enlightenment). It's a decent wm for low
> > memory machines. I'm interested in using 9fonts but haven't spent the
> > time to figure out how to do so meaningfully.
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 01:10:32AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
> Have you be
Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:13:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >
> > Depends: libgl1 ; which doesn't exist
>
> This exists in CVS. libGL.so.1 is what is used by the latest versions of
> GLX and Mesa. I think the problem was coming up with a sane way to make
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suppose I should maintain 9wm...
Does that mean you will look at these bug at least as a QA member?
[ Meaning it would be waste of time if I tried to look at them ]
--
I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to me, to everyone,
and may each o
"J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think I had some more comments, but I have no connection to
> > bugs.debian.org and can not research them. (think I have some local net
> > problems)
>
> Check out #45419 as well - lesstifg may need a "Lessdox" symlink in its doc
> directo
Raul Miller writes:
> I use 9wm (when I'm not using enlightenment). It's a decent wm for low
> memory machines. I'm interested in using 9fonts but haven't spent the
> time to figure out how to do so meaningfully.
Have you been able to containct the upstream maintainer? I tried for a
while but h
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 08:24:40PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> 9term and 9fonts provide for the only UTF-8 (unicode) capable terminal
> emulation for X currently packaged AFAIK; it would be convenient to have
> them available for i18n testing purposes.
Know where there's any decent document
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 05:50:30PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> Does anybody use 9wm, 9term, and 9fonts? Can we dump them?
I use 9wm (when I'm not using enlightenment). It's a decent wm for low
memory machines. I'm interested in using 9fonts but haven't spent the
time to figure out how to do so
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:16:04AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 12:57:49PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > When I worked on it for hamm, I basically packaged it from scratch
> > (the old source format was ugly). I had intended to go back and get
> > it to build the gopherd p
26 matches
Mail list logo
