Processed:

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 10975 Bug#10975: electric-fence: mprotect() failed: Invalid argument Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Ian Jackson (administrator, Debian bu

Processed: Sorting old bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 34184 fixed Bug#34184: filters-nonfree: Typo in description Severity set to `fixed'. > severity 29368 fixed Bug#29368: typo Severity set to `fixed'. > severity 28477 wishlist Bug#28477: xscreensaver: Please enhance it to cycle hacks by pressi

Intent to adopt sniffit

I was very impressed when I found sniffit the other day, I had been looking for a similar tool for a some time. I was even more impressed when, after discovering a different copyright, it was freed. I would like to adopt the package. -- I consume, therefore I am pgpUpXmPJiHn4.pgp Description:

Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU libapache-asp-perl 0.11-2

Le Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 08:22:11PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt écrivait: > Since this package is owned by debian-qa why not close the bug, rather > than just setting it to be fixed? It has been closed (i've done it) but the severity fixed comes from the automatic job that dinstall does. It has detected

xlife bugs

There are 3 bug reports outstanding for the package xlife, one of which has an accompanying patch and the other two shouldn't be too hard to fix. Does anyone know the status of "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" who is the maintainer? The reports are all 390 days old, with no reply from any maintainer. It look

Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU libapache-asp-perl 0.11-2

On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 02:04:05PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > severity 39976 fixed > Bug#39976: libapache-asp-perl places files in arch-specific manner > Severity set to `fixed'. Since this package is owned by debian-qa why not clos