Re: QA responsible for help in fixing bugs?

1999-05-02 Thread Martin Schulze
Torsten Landschoff wrote: > On Sun, May 02, 1999 at 02:13:42AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > Just another thought about qa: Should we make it the official address > > > to send help requests from developers? I did not see many of this on > > > -devel so I think it would be a good thing beca

Re: QA responsible for help in fixing bugs?

1999-05-02 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sun, May 02, 1999 at 02:13:42AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Just another thought about qa: Should we make it the official address > > to send help requests from developers? I did not see many of this on > > -devel so I think it would be a good thing because > > NO! That's what debian-me

Re: QA responsible for help in fixing bugs?

1999-05-02 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sun, May 02, 1999 at 12:46:05PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > I don't understand the people from QA to be better, but I think that if > a developer needs help to fix a bug and sends an email to debian-devel > the chance of answer seems less than if he would write to debian-qa. I > think so, b

Re: QA responsible for help in fixing bugs?

1999-05-02 Thread Christian Kurz
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christian Kurz wrote: > > Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just another thought about qa: Should we make it the official address > > > to send help requests from developers? I did not see many of this on > > > -devel so I think it would

Re: QA responsible for help in fixing bugs?

1999-05-02 Thread Martin Schulze
Christian Kurz wrote: > Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just another thought about qa: Should we make it the official address > > to send help requests from developers? I did not see many of this on > > -devel so I think it would be a good thing because > > Maybe this isn't a ba

Re: QA responsible for help in fixing bugs?

1999-05-02 Thread Martin Schulze
Torsten Landschoff wrote: > Hi again > > Just another thought about qa: Should we make it the official address > to send help requests from developers? I did not see many of this on > -devel so I think it would be a good thing because NO! That's what debian-mentors and debian-devel is made for.

Re: RFC: Debian Quality Assurance Group

1999-05-02 Thread Martin Schulze
Josip Rodin wrote: > I have adjusted Vincent Renardias' proposal which Martin Schulze > kindly dug out of the archives. Here it is, and I hope you all > will have something to say about it, especially if there are any > errors to correct. After we make a conclusion and any needed changes, > we must

Re: RFC: Debian Quality Assurance Group

1999-05-02 Thread Martin Schulze
Josip Rodin wrote: > The Quality Assurance Group (QA Group) is attempt of the Debian Project > to accelerate fixing bugs in our distribution. Primary occupation of the > group is finding and maintaining orphaned packages, and helping to find NO. Without reading any further I strongly disagree. I