On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 11:17:32PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Any other objections to the text?
>
> Yes, the period of 30 days is the time we should wait before an NMU can
> be done, but do we still need to ask the maintainer if we can do an NMU
> after this period ?
>From what I understoo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josip Rodin writes:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 07:12:18PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wr
> ote:
[..]
> You are completely missing the point. It is not written anywhere that
> QA Group members MUST do anything after the specified periods, but that
> they MAY do something
Le Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 08:05:41PM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
> You are completely missing the point. It is not written anywhere that
> QA Group members MUST do anything after the specified periods, but that
> they MAY do something after the specified period of time. Today, they
> actually can't
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 07:12:18PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In the normal development period (when only unstable and stable
> > distributions exist), delays are as follows:
> > * fix for a critical/grave bug: 2 days
> > * fix for any kind of security or important bu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josip Rodin writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
[..]
>
> In the normal development period (when only unstable and stable
> distributions exist), delays are as follows:
> * fix for a critical/grave bug: 2 days
> * fix for any kind of security or importa
I wonder if John Hasler is MIA?
When I look at the pppconfig bug list I wonder that this
package still works:
* [28]#21058: pppconfig: probably add the option remotename?
Package: [29]pppconfig; Severity: wishlist; Reported by: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]; 372 days old.
* [7]#24167: Hamm
6 matches
Mail list logo
