Re: Bugs difficult to fix (was RE: Signature for QA?)

On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 11:01:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > I'm not to sure that subject's an accurate summary of the atp bug -- it's > name is a personal issue (which, from looking at the bug report you don't > have a problem with), and changing it doesn't particularly improve the > program i

Re: Bugs difficult to fix (was RE: Signature for QA?)

I'm not to sure that subject's an accurate summary of the atp bug -- it's name is a personal issue (which, from looking at the bug report you don't have a problem with), and changing it doesn't particularly improve the program in any way. OTOH, I'd consider correcting the manpage to properly refle

Bugs difficult to fix (was RE: Signature for QA?)

On Mon, 5 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 1. Package writer is right. > 2. Even when he is not right, paragraph 1. is applied. This is great! May I close the infamous pine base64 bug, then? I *don't* think it is a bug, upstream authors do *not* think it is a bug either, but I was *forced* to

Processed: Reassign bug to fvwm

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 35600 fvwm Bug#35600: please add strokes support to FVWM2 Bug reassigned from package `fvwm2' to `fvwm'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Ian Jackson (administrator, Debian bugs database)

Bug#35600: please add strokes support to FVWM2

Package: fvwm2 Severity: wishlist It would be excellent if fvwm2 had support for strokes. www.etla.net/libstroke/ has the library libstroke (which I have already packaged as libstroke0) and patches for fvwm2. thanks, Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD. CCs of replies from mailing lists are welc