Re: Bad Maintainer Address

1998-04-02 Thread Brian White
> > If "sortmail" is still showing up, then the email address must still be > > wrong in the Maintainers file (as of 2 days ago). When did you upload the > > fixed package? > > It was just installed at about the time I received your report. It should be corrected by now, then. To be sure, a day

Re: Bad Maintainer Address

1998-04-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Thu, Apr 02, 1998 at 11:53:34AM -0500, Brian White wrote: > > Only sortmail is a problem -- the others should all be fine, and I did > > receive your ping at that address. > > Hmmm... I'll have to look into why the others are showing up. Thanks for > bringing it to my attention. I've since f

Re: Bad Maintainer Address

1998-04-02 Thread Raul Miller
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't actually process the name. It's just in the Maintainers file > with that address. Was that package still in Bo, or is it much older > than that? Well, it's libc4. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubsc

Re: Bad Maintainer Address

1998-04-02 Thread Brian White
> > Here is the list of failed maintainer addresses from the last "ping" I > > did. Sorry it took so long to post. > > I thought we already had a report? Did I? I don't remember sending it. Must be that acute old age setting in! > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This was a typo for the sortmai

Re: Bad Maintainer Address

1998-04-02 Thread Brian White
> >ucbmpeg_playRaul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm surprised that this is even recognized as a package. > > The name certainly isn't a valid package name any more. I don't actually process the name. It's just in the Maintainers file with that address. Was that package still

Re: Bad Maintainer Address

1998-04-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Apr 01, 1998 at 07:53:24PM -0500, Brian White wrote: > Here is the list of failed maintainer addresses from the last "ping" I > did. Sorry it took so long to post. I thought we already had a report? >[EMAIL PROTECTED] This was a typo for the sortmail package, which I've since fixed.

Re: Bad Maintainer Address

1998-04-02 Thread Raul Miller
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is the list of failed maintainer addresses from the last "ping" I > did. Sorry it took so long to post. > > If one of your packages is here, then your email address bounced mail > when sent to. There 3 common causes for this: > > (1) the package is

Bad Maintainer Address

1998-04-02 Thread Brian White
Here is the list of failed maintainer addresses from the last "ping" I did. Sorry it took so long to post. If one of your packages is here, then your email address bounced mail when sent to. There 3 common causes for this: (1) the package is obsolete: If the package still exists in Bo then