Anyone know how to fix this. I have tried purging and reinstalling python3, no
luck with that.
apt install on zlib stuff shows I already have current installed.
also I installed mutagen module and it's in python3 module directory. But I get
a module not found because I am assuming I need to
gt; memories to the release team.
Well, then, that's not going to happen before the toolchain gets fixed
on mips, because of
> Here is the list:
(...)
> xulrunner
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ensecheck -R *` (in case you haven't yet), very
> > useful script for these purposes.
>
> Indeed, I wasn't aware of that. In this case, it's even more useful
> for me to run:
>
> $ licensecheck --recursive --copyright .
Just don't forget that it will skip a
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 05:42:28PM +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote:
>
> Only that pyExcelerator is rather obsoleted by xlwt. Unforunately, that
> isn't packaged, it should be.
xlwt is packaged and is in the NEW queue:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/xlwt_0.7.0-2.html
stew
signature.asc
Descrip
BRARY_PATH
> ones) could be automatically warned about by lintian.
I wonder if this wouldn't be our duty to remove the possibility of these
vulnerabilities at all. Who relies on these PATH variables features to
include the current directory instead of adding "." ? Why don't
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
* Package name: python-wsgilog
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : L. C. Rees
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/wsgilog/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : WSGI logging and event
I would like to join the Python Modules Packaging Team in order to apply
a patch for the "pydap" package (bug 709376).
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
* Sandro Tosi, 2013-06-21, 08:37:
Sandro, are you okay with me adding Mike to the team, so the
he can commit the patch?
sorry for the late reply; sure go ahead,
Welcome to the team, Mike! :)
does Mike need a sponsor for the upload?
I believe he does.
--
Jakub Wilk
end my change into the existing changelog. Hopefully that's doing
the right thing.
The patch has been uploaded to pydap/trunk.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
's install.py for being the
point where something fails, but I am unsure. And why does fail in
Python 3.10, but not in 3.9?
https://gitlab.com/ubports/core/click/-/blob/main/click_package/install.py#L397
Also I found a comment by Colin that might be related (but why only
with Python 3.10
Hi All,
On So 29 Mai 2022 08:52:21 CEST, Mike Gabriel wrote:
We see various test failures recently when running unit tests of
click against Python 3.10. It seems that something regarding file
descriptor inheritance in subprocess calls has changed between
Python 3.9 and Python 3.10 which
Hi all, hi Daniel,
On Di 30 Jan 2024 11:12:14 CET, Daniel Teichmann wrote:
Hey,
I wanna join the debian-python packaging team.
I've got Mike Gabriel, who will be my teacher guiding me through my
way to become a Debian Maintainer.
I already have got a bit of experience with D
delete the files after printing them anyway, and
installing and uninstalling a package rather than just deleting
five files is rather more work.
--
-Mike Orr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 10:07:47AM -0500, Debian Developer wrote:
> Anybody thinking of adding zope www.zope.org into Potato ?
No, but it would be great if we did. I'm not enough of a programmer to
do this, though.
--
-Mike Orr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (permanent
n how this is being done. There seem
to differences in exactly which states (configure, etc) cause compilation,
and which states, if any, cause removal of *.py[co] files.
Is there any sort of policy for this? Or lacking that, is there a particular
package I ought to use as a good model?
Thanks,
-
modules in the root package will be in the same directory
(which isn't true for my project).
Anyway, it seems like there ought to be a policy about installing or not
installing the compiled files. Right now, to me, it looks like they should be
generated at install time...
--Mike
--
[O]n
in /usr/share/doc/python-base)
> i.e py are compiled at postinst time and revoed at prerm time.
Yes, most of the packages look like this. But as I mentioned, there are
differences, and I wonder if some of the differences aren't subtle mistakes.
--Mike
--
[O]ne of the features of the
should necessarily go in
/usr/lib/pythonX.X (or whatever). I was thinking that generally useful python
code should go in those directories, but that code that's really only useful
as part of a particular application should go under /usr/lib/
somewhere. (That's what I did for 'subte
x27;s worthwhile to provide python2-tk8.x packages ?
> Since the tk8.0-dev and tk8.3-dev still seem to conflict, the building of
> the packages would be the biggest problem.
Yes, you'd need separate source packages I think...
--
Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: 0x3B047084 7FC7
Greetings,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my tpg package. I tried asking on
debian-mentors but was unable to generate any interest, so I thought I
might try here.
* Package name: tpg
Version : 3.0.4
Upstream Author : Christophe Delord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http:/
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 02:21:34PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Python is the "official" language of Ubuntu. If we want to merge work
> they're doing (Anthony Towns mentioned their work on boot speed, for
> example) it's a good idea to structure our Python like theirs is. This
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 04:12:35PM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le samedi 21 janvier 2006 à 21:52 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 02:21:34PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Python is t
entral."
is supposed to mean.
Please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed.
Mike
PS: Anyways, there's one package you didn't list because it's in NEW,
which WON'T be merged as required by the new policy: python2.x-xpcom,
provided by xulrunner.
The reason is simple: different ins
thon-xpcom (make sure to generate the provides
> field).
What about people who want to use pyxpcom with modules that aren't
available with the current python ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 at 16:10:48 -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 22:05 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > What about people who want to use pyxpcom with modules that aren't
> > available with the current python ?
>
> But a user couldn't install more
all versions as suggested on
#d-p in case the python includes change in some ways.
Don't you think it'd be nice to add support to python-support and
python-central for that case ?
Cheers,
Mike
PS: Please Cc me, I'm not subscribed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:09:20PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently working on getting libxml2 (and later libxslt) to the new
> policy, and actually noticed something interesting:
> -rw-r--r-- root/root273888 2006-06-29
asis for differenciation shouldn't be an md5sum...
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 06:43:22PM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 17:38 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:16:40PM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Python-s
4 24 e8 e8 d9 ff ff 8b 76 18 3b |..E...$..v.;|
Yep, there's only one *bit* of difference.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:55:27PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, here is what i got for python-libxslt1: the files are the same size,
> but are different. I was wondering how different they could be and it's
> quite stunning, actually:
> [EMAIL PRO
s only one supported version of python ?
Mike
PS: Please Cc me, I'm not subscribed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
32 matches
Mail list logo
