Re: where is the Python tutorial?

2006/10/15, Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: python2.5-doc is in contrib, though (I don't know why). Because it requires non-free tools to build. Python used to ship these documentations in main without building, as upstream tarball includes documentations in compiled HTML format. -- Seo Sa

Outdated Python-related packages in Debian

My crystal ball, eh, my package tracker told me, that there are many outdated Python-related packages in Debian. I filtered false positives. (e.g. version parsing got it wrong, version packaged in Gentoo/FreeBSD is alpha/beta, etc.) http://sparcs.kaist.ac.kr/~tinuviel/package/list.cgi?name=python

Re: python-soappy, fpconst, and a new package.

I am one of SOAPpy upstream. Luke Yelavich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi all I am looking into packaging jack_mixer, requested by the upstream developer on IRC. One of its dependancies is the fpconst module. As it happens, fpconst can be found in the python-soappy package, which ahs nothing at

Re: Gaphor package depends on zope

2007/10/19, Cedric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have a new version of gaphor sitting in experimental, and I'd like to > push it into unstable. > > The problem is that this package depends on zope, because it needs > zope.component and zope.interface > > Gaphor is an UML drawing tool, so I don'

Re: Fwd: python docs in contrib?

2007/12/17, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi, > > > I was surprised to find python2.{4,5}-doc in contrib and wondered why? > > it needs latex2html to build. > Are there any free near-equivalents? There are, like hevea and tth, but as Python documentation says, "The application

Re: python "rpm" module package

On 10/20/05, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > I looked at the packages.debian.org website and thought > "python2.x-rpm" would be my solution but after install: > > root-debian# updatedb; locate rpm.py > (snip) > > So that I see rpm.py does not exist. > Would you know where and how could I install t

Re: Missing setup of /usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages

2005/11/11, Martin Skøtt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The root of the problem was that distutils, as installed by python2.4, > wasn't configured to know of /usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages. > > Would it be possible for the python2.X packages to include the > necessary /usr/lib/python2.4/distutils

Re: Missing setup of /usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages

2005/11/11, Martin Skøtt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm posting here instead of to the BTS since this problem affects > at least python2.3 and python2.4. (snip) Bug filed as #338572. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338572 Seo Sanghyeon

Re: formencode as .egg in Debian ??

Martin wrote: > If there is no way to install the package directly into site-packages > using the provided setup.py, I think setup.py should be > modified/ignored. Bob wrote: > Won't this mean a total re-write of cdbs since it specifically looks for > setup.py? Matthias Klose wrote: > yes, if cdb

Re: [Distutils] formencode as .egg in Debian ??

2005/11/28, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > (One of their other big complaints would be fixed by having Debian set > distutils.cfg such that the default install location for distutils stuff is > /usr/local/.../site-packages, rather than /usr. But I gather one such user > opened a bug for t

Re: some issues with the proposals for the python packaging infrastructure

On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 21:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > that is, packages with private modules but without extension modules > > and no modules in /usr/lib/python2.x. how many packages are this? 2006/2/3, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Off the top of my head and in no particular order:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Python packaging questions]

2006/2/4, Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am new to python packaging and I'm a little concerned about this > 'setup.py'. > > It duplicates debian/control. So whilst maintaining one I have to worry > about keeping debian/control and that setup.py in sync. Argh! > > I'm not even sure *where* and

Re: New python maintenance team

2006/4/6, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Who would be interested to help ? I am very interested. (Alioth sanxiyn-guest) Seo Sanghyeon

Re: how to make python package binNMU-safe [Bug#361940: python-mysqldb: can't be binNMUed due to arch: all -> arch: any dep]

Jonas Meurer wrote: > - drop pythonX.Y-mysqldb packages, provide one python-mysqldb package > for all python versions. i'm not sure whether this is possible at all. Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Not sure... and the python policy is kind of "not finished". But it seems > to make sense for me for some

Re: status request?

From what I can tell, nothing have changed since this summary by Raphael Hertzog two weeks ago: http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2006/05/msg00034.html "The only issue is Matthias Klose who absolutely wants to push big packaging changes at the same time whereas everybody else agree that we